* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing" failed to apply to 5.19-stable tree
@ 2022-09-24 8:38 gregkh
2022-09-24 9:22 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2022-09-24 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: palmer, ajones, atishp, conor.dooley, heiko, lkp; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 5.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Possible dependencies:
8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing")
3aefb2ee5bdd ("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 8f7e001e0325de63a42f23342ac3b8139150c5cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 23:48:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing
This fixes two issues: I truncated the warning's hart ID when porting to
the 64-bit hart ID code, and the original code's warning handling could
fire on an uninitialized hart ID.
The biggest change here is that riscv_cbom_block_size is no longer
initialized, as IMO the default isn't sane: there's nothing in the ISA
that mandates any specific cache block size, so falling back to one will
just silently produce the wrong answer on some systems. This also
changes the probing order so the cache block size is known before
enabling Zicbom support.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
CC: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
CC: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
CC: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Fixes: 3aefb2ee5bdd ("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant")
Fixes: 1631ba1259d6 ("riscv: Add support for non-coherent devices using zicbom extension")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
[Conor: fixed the redefinition errors]
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220912224800.998121-1-mail@conchuod.ie
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
diff --git a/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c b/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
index 202c83f677b2..96648c176f37 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static bool errata_probe_cmo(unsigned int stage,
if (stage == RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_EARLY_BOOT)
return false;
+ riscv_cbom_block_size = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
riscv_noncoherent_supported();
return true;
#else
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
index a60acaecfeda..a89c005b4bbf 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
+extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void);
#else
static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void) { }
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 95ef6e2bf45c..2dfc463b86bb 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -296,8 +296,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
setup_smp();
#endif
- riscv_fill_hwcap();
riscv_init_cbom_blocksize();
+ riscv_fill_hwcap();
apply_boot_alternatives();
}
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
index cd2225304c82..e3f9bdf47c5f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
-static unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
+unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
static bool noncoherent_supported;
void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
@@ -79,38 +79,41 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
{
struct device_node *node;
+ unsigned long cbom_hartid;
+ u32 val, probed_block_size;
int ret;
- u32 val;
+ probed_block_size = 0;
for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
unsigned long hartid;
- int cbom_hartid;
ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
if (ret)
continue;
- if (hartid < 0)
- continue;
-
/* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
if (ret)
continue;
- if (!riscv_cbom_block_size) {
- riscv_cbom_block_size = val;
+ if (!probed_block_size) {
+ probed_block_size = val;
cbom_hartid = hartid;
} else {
- if (riscv_cbom_block_size != val)
- pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %d and %lu\n",
+ if (probed_block_size != val)
+ pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
cbom_hartid, hartid);
}
}
+
+ if (probed_block_size)
+ riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
}
#endif
void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void)
{
+ WARN(!riscv_cbom_block_size,
+ "Non-coherent DMA support enabled without a block size\n");
noncoherent_supported = true;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing" failed to apply to 5.19-stable tree
2022-09-24 8:38 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing" failed to apply to 5.19-stable tree gregkh
@ 2022-09-24 9:22 ` Conor Dooley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Conor Dooley @ 2022-09-24 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh; +Cc: palmer, ajones, atishp, conor.dooley, heiko, lkp, stable
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 10:38:53AM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 5.19-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
>
> Possible dependencies:
>
> 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing")
> 3aefb2ee5bdd ("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant")
This is a feature not a fix, I think the CC: stable tag may have been a
mistake here - zicbom only landed this cycle.
Thanks,
Conor.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From 8f7e001e0325de63a42f23342ac3b8139150c5cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 23:48:01 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing
>
> This fixes two issues: I truncated the warning's hart ID when porting to
> the 64-bit hart ID code, and the original code's warning handling could
> fire on an uninitialized hart ID.
>
> The biggest change here is that riscv_cbom_block_size is no longer
> initialized, as IMO the default isn't sane: there's nothing in the ISA
> that mandates any specific cache block size, so falling back to one will
> just silently produce the wrong answer on some systems. This also
> changes the probing order so the cache block size is known before
> enabling Zicbom support.
>
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
> CC: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
> CC: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> CC: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> Fixes: 3aefb2ee5bdd ("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant")
> Fixes: 1631ba1259d6 ("riscv: Add support for non-coherent devices using zicbom extension")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> [Conor: fixed the redefinition errors]
> Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220912224800.998121-1-mail@conchuod.ie
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c b/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> index 202c83f677b2..96648c176f37 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static bool errata_probe_cmo(unsigned int stage,
> if (stage == RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_EARLY_BOOT)
> return false;
>
> + riscv_cbom_block_size = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
> riscv_noncoherent_supported();
> return true;
> #else
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> index a60acaecfeda..a89c005b4bbf 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local);
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> +extern unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
> void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void);
> #else
> static inline void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void) { }
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> index 95ef6e2bf45c..2dfc463b86bb 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -296,8 +296,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> setup_smp();
> #endif
>
> - riscv_fill_hwcap();
> riscv_init_cbom_blocksize();
> + riscv_fill_hwcap();
> apply_boot_alternatives();
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> index cd2225304c82..e3f9bdf47c5f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>
> -static unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
> +unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
> static bool noncoherent_supported;
>
> void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
> @@ -79,38 +79,41 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
> void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> {
> struct device_node *node;
> + unsigned long cbom_hartid;
> + u32 val, probed_block_size;
> int ret;
> - u32 val;
>
> + probed_block_size = 0;
> for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> unsigned long hartid;
> - int cbom_hartid;
>
> ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
> if (ret)
> continue;
>
> - if (hartid < 0)
> - continue;
> -
> /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
> ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
> if (ret)
> continue;
>
> - if (!riscv_cbom_block_size) {
> - riscv_cbom_block_size = val;
> + if (!probed_block_size) {
> + probed_block_size = val;
> cbom_hartid = hartid;
> } else {
> - if (riscv_cbom_block_size != val)
> - pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %d and %lu\n",
> + if (probed_block_size != val)
> + pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
> cbom_hartid, hartid);
> }
> }
> +
> + if (probed_block_size)
> + riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
> }
> #endif
>
> void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void)
> {
> + WARN(!riscv_cbom_block_size,
> + "Non-coherent DMA support enabled without a block size\n");
> noncoherent_supported = true;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-24 9:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-24 8:38 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing" failed to apply to 5.19-stable tree gregkh
2022-09-24 9:22 ` Conor Dooley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox