From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, haesbaert@haesbaert.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: don't gate task_work run on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 09:06:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <166590400224043@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Possible dependencies:
46a525e199e4 ("io_uring: don't gate task_work run on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL")
c0e0d6ba25f1 ("io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN")
b4c98d59a787 ("io_uring: introduce io_has_work")
78a861b94959 ("io_uring: add sync cancelation API through io_uring_register()")
c34398a8c018 ("io_uring: remove __io_req_task_work_add")
ed5ccb3beeba ("io_uring: remove priority tw list optimisation")
625d38b3fd34 ("io_uring: improve io_run_task_work()")
4a0fef62788b ("io_uring: optimize io_uring_task layout")
253993210bd8 ("io_uring: introduce locking helpers for CQE posting")
305bef988708 ("io_uring: hide eventfd assumptions in eventfd paths")
affa87db9010 ("io_uring: fix multi ctx cancellation")
d9dee4302a7c ("io_uring: remove ->flush_cqes optimisation")
a830ffd28780 ("io_uring: move io_eventfd_signal()")
9046c6415be6 ("io_uring: reshuffle io_uring/io_uring.h")
d142c3ec8d16 ("io_uring: remove extra io_commit_cqring()")
68494a65d0e2 ("io_uring: introduce io_req_cqe_overflow()")
faf88dde060f ("io_uring: don't inline __io_get_cqe()")
d245bca6375b ("io_uring: don't expose io_fill_cqe_aux()")
9ca9fb24d5fe ("io_uring: mutex locked poll hashing")
e6f89be61410 ("io_uring: introduce a struct for hash table")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 46a525e199e4037516f7e498c18f065b09df32ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 15:29:13 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: don't gate task_work run on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL
This isn't a reliable mechanism to tell if we have task_work pending, we
really should be looking at whether we have any items queued. This is
problematic if forward progress is gated on running said task_work. One
such example is reading from a pipe, where the write side has been closed
right before the read is started. The fput() of the file queues TWA_RESUME
task_work, and we need that task_work to be run before ->release() is
called for the pipe. If ->release() isn't called, then the read will sit
forever waiting on data that will never arise.
Fix this by io_run_task_work() so it checks if we have task_work pending
rather than rely on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL for that. The latter obviously
doesn't work for task_work that is queued without TWA_SIGNAL.
Reported-by: Christiano Haesbaert <haesbaert@haesbaert.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/665
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h
index 177bd55357d7..48ce2348c8c1 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.h
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h
@@ -231,11 +231,11 @@ static inline unsigned int io_sqring_entries(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
static inline int io_run_task_work(void)
{
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)) {
+ if (task_work_pending(current)) {
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
+ clear_notify_signal();
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- clear_notify_signal();
- if (task_work_pending(current))
- task_work_run();
+ task_work_run();
return 1;
}
reply other threads:[~2022-10-16 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=166590400224043@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=haesbaert@haesbaert.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox