From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: aahringo@redhat.com, teigland@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fs: dlm: fix invalid derefence of sb_lvbptr" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 09:31:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <166590551212275@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Possible dependencies:
7175e131ebba ("fs: dlm: fix invalid derefence of sb_lvbptr")
00e99ccde757 ("dlm: use __le types for dlm messages")
2f9dbeda8dc0 ("dlm: use __le types for rcom messages")
3428785a65da ("dlm: use __le types for dlm header")
6c2e3bf68f3e ("fs: dlm: filter user dlm messages for kernel locks")
9af5b8f0ead7 ("fs: dlm: add debugfs rawmsg send functionality")
88aa023a2556 ("fs: dlm: cleanup and remove _send_rcom")
d10a0b88751a ("fs: dlm: rename socket and app buffer defines")
5b2f981fde8b ("fs: dlm: add midcomms debugfs functionality")
489d8e559c65 ("fs: dlm: add reliable connection if reconnect")
8e2e40860c7f ("fs: dlm: add union in dlm header for lockspace id")
37a247da517f ("fs: dlm: move out some hash functionality")
8f2dc78dbc20 ("fs: dlm: make buffer handling per msg")
a070a91cf140 ("fs: dlm: add more midcomms hooks")
6fb5cf9d4206 ("fs: dlm: public header in out utility")
8aa31cbf20ad ("fs: dlm: fix connection tcp EOF handling")
ba868d9deaab ("fs: dlm: reconnect if socket error report occurs")
b38bc9c2b317 ("fs: dlm: fix srcu read lock usage")
2fd8db2dd05d ("fs: dlm: fix missing unlock on error in accept_from_sock()")
9d232469bcd7 ("fs: dlm: add shutdown hook")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 7175e131ebba47afef47e6ac4d5bab474d1e6e49 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:43:19 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] fs: dlm: fix invalid derefence of sb_lvbptr
I experience issues when putting a lkbsb on the stack and have sb_lvbptr
field to a dangled pointer while not using DLM_LKF_VALBLK. It will crash
with the following kernel message, the dangled pointer is here
0xdeadbeef as example:
[ 102.749317] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000deadbeef
[ 102.749320] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 102.749323] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 102.749325] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 102.749332] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[ 102.749336] CPU: 0 PID: 1567 Comm: lock_torture_wr Tainted: G W 5.19.0-rc3+ #1565
[ 102.749343] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.16.0-2.module+el8.7.0+15506+033991b0 04/01/2014
[ 102.749344] RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0x6/0x10
[ 102.749353] Code: cc cc cc cc eb 1e 0f 1f 00 48 89 f8 48 89 d1 48 c1 e9 03 83 e2 07 f3 48 a5 89 d1 f3 a4 c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 d1 <f3> a4 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 83 fa 20 72 7e 40 38 fe
[ 102.749355] RSP: 0018:ffff97a58145fd08 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 102.749358] RAX: ffff901778b77070 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000040
[ 102.749360] RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 00000000deadbeef RDI: ffff901778b77070
[ 102.749362] RBP: ffff97a58145fd10 R08: ffff901760b67a70 R09: 0000000000000001
[ 102.749364] R10: ffff9017008e2cb8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff901760b67a70
[ 102.749366] R13: ffff901760b78f00 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 0000000000000001
[ 102.749368] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff901876e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 102.749372] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 102.749374] CR2: 00000000deadbeef CR3: 000000017c49a004 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
[ 102.749376] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 102.749378] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 102.749379] PKRU: 55555554
[ 102.749381] Call Trace:
[ 102.749382] <TASK>
[ 102.749383] ? send_args+0xb2/0xd0
[ 102.749389] send_common+0xb7/0xd0
[ 102.749395] _unlock_lock+0x2c/0x90
[ 102.749400] unlock_lock.isra.56+0x62/0xa0
[ 102.749405] dlm_unlock+0x21e/0x330
[ 102.749411] ? lock_torture_stats+0x80/0x80 [dlm_locktorture]
[ 102.749416] torture_unlock+0x5a/0x90 [dlm_locktorture]
[ 102.749419] ? preempt_count_sub+0xba/0x100
[ 102.749427] lock_torture_writer+0xbd/0x150 [dlm_locktorture]
[ 102.786186] kthread+0x10a/0x130
[ 102.786581] ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
[ 102.787156] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 102.787588] </TASK>
[ 102.787855] Modules linked in: dlm_locktorture torture rpcsec_gss_krb5 intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common kvm_intel iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support kvm vmw_vsock_virtio_transport qxl irqbypass vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common drm_ttm_helper crc32_pclmul joydev crc32c_intel ttm vsock virtio_scsi virtio_balloon snd_pcm drm_kms_helper virtio_console snd_timer snd drm soundcore syscopyarea i2c_i801 sysfillrect sysimgblt i2c_smbus pcspkr fb_sys_fops lpc_ich serio_raw
[ 102.792536] CR2: 00000000deadbeef
[ 102.792930] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
This patch fixes the issue by checking also on DLM_LKF_VALBLK on exflags
is set when copying the lvbptr array instead of if it's just null which
fixes for me the issue.
I think this patch can fix other dlm users as well, depending how they
handle the init, freeing memory handling of sb_lvbptr and don't set
DLM_LKF_VALBLK for some dlm_lock() calls. It might a there could be a
hidden issue all the time. However with checking on DLM_LKF_VALBLK the
user always need to provide a sb_lvbptr non-null value. There might be
more intelligent handling between per ls lvblen, DLM_LKF_VALBLK and
non-null to report the user the way how DLM API is used is wrong but can
be added for later, this will only fix the current behaviour.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index 354f79254d62..da95ba3c295e 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -3651,7 +3651,7 @@ static void send_args(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb,
case cpu_to_le32(DLM_MSG_REQUEST_REPLY):
case cpu_to_le32(DLM_MSG_CONVERT_REPLY):
case cpu_to_le32(DLM_MSG_GRANT):
- if (!lkb->lkb_lvbptr)
+ if (!lkb->lkb_lvbptr || !(lkb->lkb_exflags & DLM_LKF_VALBLK))
break;
memcpy(ms->m_extra, lkb->lkb_lvbptr, r->res_ls->ls_lvblen);
break;
reply other threads:[~2022-10-16 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=166590551212275@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox