public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mhiramat@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/kprobes: Fix optprobe optimization check with" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 15:09:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <167284134324455@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

Possible dependencies:

63dc6325ff41 ("x86/kprobes: Fix optprobe optimization check with CONFIG_RETHUNK")
77e768ec1391 ("x86/kprobes: Convert to insn_decode()")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 63dc6325ff41ee9e570bde705ac34a39c5dbeb44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:35:19 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] x86/kprobes: Fix optprobe optimization check with
 CONFIG_RETHUNK

Since the CONFIG_RETHUNK and CONFIG_SLS will use INT3 for stopping
speculative execution after function return, kprobe jump optimization
always fails on the functions with such INT3 inside the function body.
(It already checks the INT3 padding between functions, but not inside
 the function)

To avoid this issue, as same as kprobes, check whether the INT3 comes
from kgdb or not, and if so, stop decoding and make it fail. The other
INT3 will come from CONFIG_RETHUNK/CONFIG_SLS and those can be
treated as a one-byte instruction.

Fixes: e463a09af2f0 ("x86: Add straight-line-speculation mitigation")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/167146051929.1374301.7419382929328081706.stgit@devnote3

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
index e6b8c5362b94..e57e07b0edb6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/opt.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/extable.h>
 #include <linux/kdebug.h>
 #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
+#include <linux/kgdb.h>
 #include <linux/ftrace.h>
 #include <linux/objtool.h>
 #include <linux/pgtable.h>
@@ -279,19 +280,6 @@ static int insn_is_indirect_jump(struct insn *insn)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static bool is_padding_int3(unsigned long addr, unsigned long eaddr)
-{
-	unsigned char ops;
-
-	for (; addr < eaddr; addr++) {
-		if (get_kernel_nofault(ops, (void *)addr) < 0 ||
-		    ops != INT3_INSN_OPCODE)
-			return false;
-	}
-
-	return true;
-}
-
 /* Decode whole function to ensure any instructions don't jump into target */
 static int can_optimize(unsigned long paddr)
 {
@@ -334,15 +322,15 @@ static int can_optimize(unsigned long paddr)
 		ret = insn_decode_kernel(&insn, (void *)recovered_insn);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return 0;
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_KGDB
 		/*
-		 * In the case of detecting unknown breakpoint, this could be
-		 * a padding INT3 between functions. Let's check that all the
-		 * rest of the bytes are also INT3.
+		 * If there is a dynamically installed kgdb sw breakpoint,
+		 * this function should not be probed.
 		 */
-		if (insn.opcode.bytes[0] == INT3_INSN_OPCODE)
-			return is_padding_int3(addr, paddr - offset + size) ? 1 : 0;
-
+		if (insn.opcode.bytes[0] == INT3_INSN_OPCODE &&
+		    kgdb_has_hit_break(addr))
+			return 0;
+#endif
 		/* Recover address */
 		insn.kaddr = (void *)addr;
 		insn.next_byte = (void *)(addr + insn.length);


                 reply	other threads:[~2023-01-04 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=167284134324455@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox