From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: mq-deadline: Fix dd_finish_request() for zoned devices" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 15:21:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <167284210313124@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Possible dependencies:
2820e5d0820a ("block: mq-deadline: Fix dd_finish_request() for zoned devices")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 2820e5d0820ac4daedff1272616a53d9c7682fd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:12:07 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] block: mq-deadline: Fix dd_finish_request() for zoned devices
dd_finish_request() tests if the per prio fifo_list is not empty to
determine if request dispatching must be restarted for handling blocked
write requests to zoned devices with a call to
blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(). While simple, this implementation has
2 problems:
1) Only the priority level of the completed request is considered.
However, writes to a zone may be blocked due to other writes to the
same zone using a different priority level. While this is unlikely to
happen in practice, as writing a zone with different IO priorirites
does not make sense, nothing in the code prevents this from
happening.
2) The use of list_empty() is dangerous as dd_finish_request() does not
take dd->lock and may run concurrently with the insert and dispatch
code.
Fix these 2 problems by testing the write fifo list of all priority
levels using the new helper dd_has_write_work(), and by testing each
fifo list using list_empty_careful().
Fixes: c807ab520fc3 ("block/mq-deadline: Add I/O priority support")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221124021208.242541-2-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index 5639921dfa92..36374481cb87 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -789,6 +789,18 @@ static void dd_prepare_request(struct request *rq)
rq->elv.priv[0] = NULL;
}
+static bool dd_has_write_work(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+{
+ struct deadline_data *dd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;
+ enum dd_prio p;
+
+ for (p = 0; p <= DD_PRIO_MAX; p++)
+ if (!list_empty_careful(&dd->per_prio[p].fifo_list[DD_WRITE]))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* Callback from inside blk_mq_free_request().
*
@@ -828,9 +840,10 @@ static void dd_finish_request(struct request *rq)
spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->zone_lock, flags);
blk_req_zone_write_unlock(rq);
- if (!list_empty(&per_prio->fifo_list[DD_WRITE]))
- blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(rq->mq_hctx);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dd->zone_lock, flags);
+
+ if (dd_has_write_work(rq->mq_hctx))
+ blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(rq->mq_hctx);
}
}
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-04 14:21 gregkh [this message]
2023-01-05 4:07 ` [PATCH] block: mq-deadline: Fix dd_finish_request() for zoned devices Damien Le Moal
2023-01-05 11:49 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-05 4:08 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: mq-deadline: Fix dd_finish_request() for zoned devices" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=167284210313124@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox