* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix compat_ro checks against remount" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
@ 2023-01-09 12:54 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2023-01-09 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wqu, anand.jain, dsterba, shepjeng; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Possible dependencies:
2ba48b20049b ("btrfs: fix compat_ro checks against remount")
d7f67ac9a928 ("btrfs: relax block-group-tree feature dependency checks")
a05d3c915314 ("btrfs: check superblock to ensure the fs was not modified at thaw time")
49f468c93807 ("btrfs: don't print 'has skinny extents' anymore on mount")
6b769dac219d ("btrfs: don't print 'flagging with big metadata' anymore on mount")
e26b04c4c919 ("btrfs: properly flag filesystem with BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_BIG_METADATA")
dc4d31684974 ("btrfs: reject log replay if there is unsupported RO compat flag")
0591f0403621 ("btrfs: prevent remounting to v1 space cache for subpage mount")
d5321a0fa8bc ("btrfs: add "0x" prefix for unsupported optional features")
8481dd80ab1e ("btrfs: subpage: introduce btrfs_subpage_bitmap_info")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 2ba48b20049b5a76f34a85f853c9496d1b10533a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 07:59:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix compat_ro checks against remount
[BUG]
Even with commit 81d5d61454c3 ("btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO
flags handling"), btrfs can still mount a fs with unsupported compat_ro
flags read-only, then remount it RW:
# btrfs ins dump-super /dev/loop0 | grep compat_ro_flags -A 3
compat_ro_flags 0x403
( FREE_SPACE_TREE |
FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID |
unknown flag: 0x400 )
# mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs
mount: /mnt/btrfs: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
^^^ RW mount failed as expected ^^^
# dmesg -t | tail -n5
loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 1048576
BTRFS: device fsid cb5b82f5-0fdd-4d81-9b4b-78533c324afa devid 1 transid 7 /dev/loop0 scanned by mount (1146)
BTRFS info (device loop0): using crc32c (crc32c-intel) checksum algorithm
BTRFS info (device loop0): using free space tree
BTRFS error (device loop0): cannot mount read-write because of unknown compat_ro features (0x403)
BTRFS error (device loop0): open_ctree failed
# mount /dev/loop0 -o ro /mnt/btrfs
# mount -o remount,rw /mnt/btrfs
^^^ RW remount succeeded unexpectedly ^^^
[CAUSE]
Currently we use btrfs_check_features() to check compat_ro flags against
our current mount flags.
That function get reused between open_ctree() and btrfs_remount().
But for btrfs_remount(), the super block we passed in still has the old
mount flags, thus btrfs_check_features() still believes we're mounting
read-only.
[FIX]
Replace the existing @sb argument with @is_rw_mount.
As originally we only use @sb to determine if the mount is RW.
Now it's callers' responsibility to determine if the mount is RW, and
since there are only two callers, the check is pretty simple:
- caller in open_ctree()
Just pass !sb_rdonly().
- caller in btrfs_remount()
Pass !(*flags & SB_RDONLY), as our check should be against the new
flags.
Now we can correctly reject the RW remount:
# mount /dev/loop0 -o ro /mnt/btrfs
# mount -o remount,rw /mnt/btrfs
mount: /mnt/btrfs: mount point not mounted or bad option.
dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
# dmesg -t | tail -n 1
BTRFS error (device loop0: state M): cannot mount read-write because of unknown compat_ro features (0x403)
Reported-by: Chung-Chiang Cheng <shepjeng@gmail.com>
Fixes: 81d5d61454c3 ("btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO flags handling")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 9940cc39dbc9..8aeaada1fcae 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3384,6 +3384,8 @@ int btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
/*
* Do various sanity and dependency checks of different features.
*
+ * @is_rw_mount: If the mount is read-write.
+ *
* This is the place for less strict checks (like for subpage or artificial
* feature dependencies).
*
@@ -3394,7 +3396,7 @@ int btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
* (space cache related) can modify on-disk format like free space tree and
* screw up certain feature dependencies.
*/
-int btrfs_check_features(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct super_block *sb)
+int btrfs_check_features(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, bool is_rw_mount)
{
struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
u64 incompat = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(disk_super);
@@ -3433,7 +3435,7 @@ int btrfs_check_features(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct super_block *sb)
if (btrfs_super_nodesize(disk_super) > PAGE_SIZE)
incompat |= BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_BIG_METADATA;
- if (compat_ro_unsupp && !sb_rdonly(sb)) {
+ if (compat_ro_unsupp && is_rw_mount) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
"cannot mount read-write because of unknown compat_ro features (0x%llx)",
compat_ro);
@@ -3636,7 +3638,7 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb, struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_device
goto fail_alloc;
}
- ret = btrfs_check_features(fs_info, sb);
+ ret = btrfs_check_features(fs_info, !sb_rdonly(sb));
if (ret < 0) {
err = ret;
goto fail_alloc;
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
index 363935cfc084..f2f295eb6103 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.h
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ int __cold open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
void __cold close_ctree(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
int btrfs_validate_super(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct btrfs_super_block *sb, int mirror_num);
-int btrfs_check_features(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct super_block *sb);
+int btrfs_check_features(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, bool is_rw_mount);
int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, int max_mirrors);
struct btrfs_super_block *btrfs_read_dev_super(struct block_device *bdev);
struct btrfs_super_block *btrfs_read_dev_one_super(struct block_device *bdev,
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index d5de18d6517e..433ce221dc5c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -1705,7 +1705,7 @@ static int btrfs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
if (ret)
goto restore;
- ret = btrfs_check_features(fs_info, sb);
+ ret = btrfs_check_features(fs_info, !(*flags & SB_RDONLY));
if (ret < 0)
goto restore;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-01-09 12:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-09 12:54 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix compat_ro checks against remount" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).