From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: alexander@wetzel-home.de, johannes.berg@intel.com, oliver.sang@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] wifi: mac80211: Fix iTXQ AMPDU fragmentation handling" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 11:26:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <167429677624186@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
Possible dependencies:
592234e941f1 ("wifi: mac80211: Fix iTXQ AMPDU fragmentation handling")
4444bc2116ae ("wifi: mac80211: Proper mark iTXQs for resumption")
7d360f6061db ("wifi: mac80211: add support for restricting netdev features per vif")
107395f9cf44 ("wifi: mac80211: Drop support for TX push path")
dfd2d876b3fd ("Merge remote-tracking branch 'wireless/main' into wireless-next")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 592234e941f1addaa598601c9227e3b72d608625 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Wetzel <alexander@wetzel-home.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 23:31:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] wifi: mac80211: Fix iTXQ AMPDU fragmentation handling
mac80211 must not enable aggregation wile transmitting a fragmented
MPDU. Enforce that for mac80211 internal TX queues (iTXQs).
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202301021738.7cd3e6ae-oliver.sang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Alexander Wetzel <alexander@wetzel-home.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230106223141.98696-1-alexander@wetzel-home.de
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
diff --git a/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c b/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c
index 3dbb724d7dc4..f9514bacbd4a 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/agg-tx.c
@@ -511,8 +511,6 @@ void ieee80211_tx_ba_session_handle_start(struct sta_info *sta, int tid)
*/
clear_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_WANT_START, &tid_tx->state);
- ieee80211_agg_stop_txq(sta, tid);
-
/*
* Make sure no packets are being processed. This ensures that
* we have a valid starting sequence number and that in-flight
diff --git a/net/mac80211/ht.c b/net/mac80211/ht.c
index 83bc41346ae7..5315ab750280 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/ht.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/ht.c
@@ -391,6 +391,37 @@ void ieee80211_ba_session_work(struct work_struct *work)
tid_tx = sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_start_tx[tid];
if (!blocked && tid_tx) {
+ struct txq_info *txqi = to_txq_info(sta->sta.txq[tid]);
+ struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata =
+ vif_to_sdata(txqi->txq.vif);
+ struct fq *fq = &sdata->local->fq;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&fq->lock);
+
+ /* Allow only frags to be dequeued */
+ set_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_STOP, &txqi->flags);
+
+ if (!skb_queue_empty(&txqi->frags)) {
+ /* Fragmented Tx is ongoing, wait for it to
+ * finish. Reschedule worker to retry later.
+ */
+
+ spin_unlock_bh(&fq->lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sta->lock);
+
+ /* Give the task working on the txq a chance
+ * to send out the queued frags
+ */
+ synchronize_net();
+
+ mutex_unlock(&sta->ampdu_mlme.mtx);
+
+ ieee80211_queue_work(&sdata->local->hw, work);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_bh(&fq->lock);
+
/*
* Assign it over to the normal tid_tx array
* where it "goes live".
diff --git a/net/mac80211/tx.c b/net/mac80211/tx.c
index 178043f84489..defe97a31724 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/tx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c
@@ -1129,7 +1129,6 @@ static bool ieee80211_tx_prep_agg(struct ieee80211_tx_data *tx,
struct sk_buff *purge_skb = NULL;
if (test_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_OPERATIONAL, &tid_tx->state)) {
- info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU;
reset_agg_timer = true;
} else if (test_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_WANT_START, &tid_tx->state)) {
/*
@@ -1161,7 +1160,6 @@ static bool ieee80211_tx_prep_agg(struct ieee80211_tx_data *tx,
if (!tid_tx) {
/* do nothing, let packet pass through */
} else if (test_bit(HT_AGG_STATE_OPERATIONAL, &tid_tx->state)) {
- info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU;
reset_agg_timer = true;
} else {
queued = true;
@@ -3677,8 +3675,7 @@ static void __ieee80211_xmit_fast(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
info->band = fast_tx->band;
info->control.vif = &sdata->vif;
info->flags = IEEE80211_TX_CTL_FIRST_FRAGMENT |
- IEEE80211_TX_CTL_DONTFRAG |
- (ampdu ? IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU : 0);
+ IEEE80211_TX_CTL_DONTFRAG;
info->control.flags = IEEE80211_TX_CTRL_FAST_XMIT |
u32_encode_bits(IEEE80211_LINK_UNSPECIFIED,
IEEE80211_TX_CTRL_MLO_LINK);
@@ -3804,9 +3801,6 @@ struct sk_buff *ieee80211_tx_dequeue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
spin_lock_bh(&fq->lock);
- if (unlikely(test_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_STOP, &txqi->flags)))
- goto out;
-
/* Make sure fragments stay together. */
skb = __skb_dequeue(&txqi->frags);
if (unlikely(skb)) {
@@ -3816,6 +3810,9 @@ struct sk_buff *ieee80211_tx_dequeue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb)->control.flags &=
~IEEE80211_TX_INTCFL_NEED_TXPROCESSING;
} else {
+ if (unlikely(test_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_STOP, &txqi->flags)))
+ goto out;
+
skb = fq_tin_dequeue(fq, tin, fq_tin_dequeue_func);
}
@@ -3866,9 +3863,8 @@ struct sk_buff *ieee80211_tx_dequeue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
}
if (test_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_AMPDU, &txqi->flags))
- info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU;
- else
- info->flags &= ~IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU;
+ info->flags |= (IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU |
+ IEEE80211_TX_CTL_DONTFRAG);
if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_HW_80211_ENCAP) {
if (!ieee80211_hw_check(&local->hw, HAS_RATE_CONTROL)) {
@@ -4602,8 +4598,6 @@ static void ieee80211_8023_xmit(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
- if (tid_tx)
- info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU;
info->hw_queue = sdata->vif.hw_queue[queue];
reply other threads:[~2023-01-21 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=167429677624186@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander@wetzel-home.de \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox