public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: handle TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME when checking for" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:48:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16780996985892@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x b5d3ae202fbfe055aa2a8ae8524531ee1dcab717
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '16780996985892@kroah.com' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

b5d3ae202fbf ("io_uring: handle TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME when checking for task_work")
7cfe7a09489c ("io_uring: clear TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL if set and task_work not available")
46a525e199e4 ("io_uring: don't gate task_work run on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL")
c0e0d6ba25f1 ("io_uring: add IORING_SETUP_DEFER_TASKRUN")
b4c98d59a787 ("io_uring: introduce io_has_work")
78a861b94959 ("io_uring: add sync cancelation API through io_uring_register()")
c34398a8c018 ("io_uring: remove __io_req_task_work_add")
ed5ccb3beeba ("io_uring: remove priority tw list optimisation")
625d38b3fd34 ("io_uring: improve io_run_task_work()")
4a0fef62788b ("io_uring: optimize io_uring_task layout")
253993210bd8 ("io_uring: introduce locking helpers for CQE posting")
305bef988708 ("io_uring: hide eventfd assumptions in eventfd paths")
affa87db9010 ("io_uring: fix multi ctx cancellation")
d9dee4302a7c ("io_uring: remove ->flush_cqes optimisation")
a830ffd28780 ("io_uring: move io_eventfd_signal()")
9046c6415be6 ("io_uring: reshuffle io_uring/io_uring.h")
d142c3ec8d16 ("io_uring: remove extra io_commit_cqring()")
ab1c84d855cf ("io_uring: make io_uring_types.h public")
68494a65d0e2 ("io_uring: introduce io_req_cqe_overflow()")
faf88dde060f ("io_uring: don't inline __io_get_cqe()")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From b5d3ae202fbfe055aa2a8ae8524531ee1dcab717 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 08:24:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: handle TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME when checking for
 task_work

If TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is set, then we need to call resume_user_mode_work()
for PF_IO_WORKER threads. They never return to usermode, hence never get
a chance to process any items that are marked by this flag. Most notably
this includes the final put of files, but also any throttling markers set
by block cgroups.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h
index c68edf9872a5..d58cfe062da9 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.h
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/lockdep.h>
+#include <linux/resume_user_mode.h>
 #include <linux/io_uring_types.h>
 #include <uapi/linux/eventpoll.h>
 #include "io-wq.h"
@@ -274,6 +275,13 @@ static inline int io_run_task_work(void)
 	 */
 	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
 		clear_notify_signal();
+	/*
+	 * PF_IO_WORKER never returns to userspace, so check here if we have
+	 * notify work that needs processing.
+	 */
+	if (current->flags & PF_IO_WORKER &&
+	    test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME))
+		resume_user_mode_work(NULL);
 	if (task_work_pending(current)) {
 		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 		task_work_run();


             reply	other threads:[~2023-03-06 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-06 10:48 gregkh [this message]
2023-03-06 21:29 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: handle TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME when checking for" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree Jens Axboe
2023-03-07  9:30   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16780996985892@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox