From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from manchmal.in-ulm.de (manchmal.in-ulm.de [217.10.9.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91AE3E56C for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 13:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.10.9.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733403763; cv=none; b=u+PwITd84hP79Wb9iDF5VPNCkhgb9LdMmHh8XCjhZIhWONkiCjWAjz8AgBHsW906AlSWZLtGmcxn61YdFPOipV4eftdDHZRRU3bdgoFLaUUMC4KEm3IQ58VxD1ZFlOFmpHd6HUozxIN47G83W4apIEfwU6/88oVry+UhXlI+oeU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733403763; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WgpvGL5BxCJsjOvjeJemyfuhES6b1p6rzsUs9Z0zQ3g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mmZwURcZQksepd4lsoXWB+5a2IaIPnxjkW+SwLKV2Sx2KXDf3kJx4XuUzshYKbqL/YYL1v/2YS0elt8y6CughLxeO/rZDP0G/RIrsXrEzikyccQPQ9aMhEJrIIDpYvVwUFsfuoJPZpP9pMm3+xmWDJmEzcbEb6uX7LCu3rQpUC4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=manchmal.in-ulm.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manchmal.in-ulm.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.10.9.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=manchmal.in-ulm.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manchmal.in-ulm.de Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 14:02:29 +0100 From: Christoph Biedl To: Greg KH Cc: Alex Deucher , Sasha Levin , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Siqueira, Rodrigo" Subject: Re: drm/amd/display: Pass pwrseq inst for backlight and ABM Message-ID: <1733403204@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> References: <1733138635@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <2024120231-untimely-undivided-e1d7@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2024120231-untimely-undivided-e1d7@gregkh> Greg KH wrote... > On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 12:33:48PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > tl;dr: Was it possible to have this in 6.1.y? (...) > Why not just move to 6.6.y instead? What's preventing that from > happening? Reasons are mostly political, also switching series this is a bigger change that naturally requires way more careful testing for regressions. It will happen somewhen in the next year anyway, a cherry-picked fix could have been shipped now-ish. But it seems this is not an option. Christoph