From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6.y 1/4] mm: drop the assumption that VM_SHARED always implies writable
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 12:29:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1753867166-903c855a@stable.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250730015152.29758-2-isaacmanjarres@google.com>
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: e8e17ee90eaf650c855adb0a3e5e965fd6692ff1
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>
Commit author: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Status in newer kernel trees:
6.15.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1)
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1: e8e17ee90eaf ! 1: 05fbf991dedb mm: drop the assumption that VM_SHARED always implies writable
@@ Metadata
## Commit message ##
mm: drop the assumption that VM_SHARED always implies writable
+ [ Upstream commit e8e17ee90eaf650c855adb0a3e5e965fd6692ff1 ]
+
Patch series "permit write-sealed memfd read-only shared mappings", v4.
The man page for fcntl() describing memfd file seals states the following
@@ Commit message
[1]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230324133646.16101dfa666f253c4715d965@linux-foundation.org/
[2]:https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217238
-
This patch (of 3):
There is a general assumption that VMAs with the VM_SHARED flag set are
@@ Commit message
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+ Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+ [isaacmanjarres: resolved merge conflicts due to
+ due to refactoring that happened in upstream commit
+ 5de195060b2e ("mm: resolve faulty mmap_region() error path behaviour")]
+ Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@google.com>
## include/linux/fs.h ##
@@ include/linux/fs.h: extern const struct address_space_operations empty_aops;
@@ mm/mmap.c: static unsigned long count_vma_pages_range(struct mm_struct *mm,
mapping_allow_writable(mapping);
flush_dcache_mmap_lock(mapping);
-@@ mm/mmap.c: unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
- vma->vm_pgoff = pgoff;
-
- if (file) {
-- if (vm_flags & VM_SHARED) {
-+ if (is_shared_maywrite(vm_flags)) {
- error = mapping_map_writable(file->f_mapping);
- if (error)
- goto free_vma;
-@@ mm/mmap.c: unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
+@@ mm/mmap.c: static unsigned long __mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
mm->map_count++;
if (vma->vm_file) {
i_mmap_lock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
@@ mm/mmap.c: unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
flush_dcache_mmap_lock(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
@@ mm/mmap.c: unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
+ return -EINVAL;
- /* Once vma denies write, undo our temporary denial count */
- unmap_writable:
-- if (file && vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
-+ if (file && is_shared_maywrite(vm_flags))
- mapping_unmap_writable(file->f_mapping);
- file = vma->vm_file;
- ksm_add_vma(vma);
-@@ mm/mmap.c: unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
- unmap_region(mm, &vmi.mas, vma, prev, next, vma->vm_start,
- vma->vm_end, vma->vm_end, true);
- }
-- if (file && (vm_flags & VM_SHARED))
-+ if (file && is_shared_maywrite(vm_flags))
- mapping_unmap_writable(file->f_mapping);
- free_vma:
- vm_area_free(vma);
+ /* Map writable and ensure this isn't a sealed memfd. */
+- if (file && (vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
++ if (file && is_shared_maywrite(vm_flags)) {
+ int error = mapping_map_writable(file->f_mapping);
+
+ if (error)
---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| 6.6 | Success | Success |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-30 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-30 1:51 [PATCH 6.6.y 0/4] Backport series: "permit write-sealed memfd read-only shared mappings" Isaac J. Manjarres
2025-07-30 1:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 1/4] mm: drop the assumption that VM_SHARED always implies writable Isaac J. Manjarres
2025-07-30 16:29 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-07-30 1:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 2/4] mm: update memfd seal write check to include F_SEAL_WRITE Isaac J. Manjarres
2025-07-30 16:29 ` Sasha Levin
2025-07-30 1:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 3/4] mm: reinstate ability to map write-sealed memfd mappings read-only Isaac J. Manjarres
2025-07-30 16:29 ` Sasha Levin
2025-07-30 1:51 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 4/4] selftests/memfd: add test for mapping write-sealed memfd read-only Isaac J. Manjarres
2025-07-30 16:29 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1753867166-903c855a@stable.kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox