From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80BF94501A; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 17:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759426762; cv=none; b=BlAanXxRij4+Fr4YcUDlnDZvvxJCbI+mtr2Bxte6UvEIvUFJneJVBaJyQybugzuXk8iR+MNYT54Vaqj3tU2ZJ7HexNvUHVYB61oQCusMVWy6TmNEh6E0VQsJbC0Upp+OrlBLtmtJK+8Wh3UAURfrWvYaum/RR6f1q9NyWmx65sg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759426762; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ol9QmzDRQIdGFburmMnhzuufrNXKQBUmjDyAxdEnvGE=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pXLf0eoTM5ocwD0FTDD4OeByqQOCGBSb0UKaTL2V9zIsUoO24176I7u52jpIysgifdeHWrmDWk+CBv9UNBaHqH4fvq1E4kgqCtmNE61CxRBiDzU44n1w7gOfH1UtYLQkEj7yV3idPAUmtdRL/FWNZOsZ6qQBdx+beuvFHcmImgw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MlLUPLBa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MlLUPLBa" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E687C4CEF4; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 17:39:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1759426761; bh=Ol9QmzDRQIdGFburmMnhzuufrNXKQBUmjDyAxdEnvGE=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=MlLUPLBaXClB7qR6Sj6LY83HPaZEv21Ts16hf2vVLGVtCWhMpXE/+pLoUktblVdfH LCBniRBTdaR2q8q6Qxy4WA5rGmvd73RLTZFr0F7QTccbtjOCcKBysXcvjCRaLtV4FP byijzk79IBTU3j78OQRGs8OwcV8dDD3BzCAjeY446aAsGOL0RnzZAdZD8Wl41Ty6Gt bw/PPj8OELOleqPmnBaycSA2v+EL03hbA2k5mqPNAG/pxbOQEY0Yzi0rfg3DV5UplR UvNzypPcfKOC1X+Z3OPnbiqBn+ZJukXAI3/FjF9Vk2SSWPcAkof+33Bo51jXWu307f 8yXoRqUwN1/Mg== From: Mark Brown To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, Peter Ujfalusi Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com, yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20251002125322.15692-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> References: <20251002125322.15692-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ASoC: SOF: ipc4/Intel: Fix the host buffer constraint Message-Id: <175942675900.119208.781210005170787305.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 18:39:19 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-56183 On Thu, 02 Oct 2025 15:53:19 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Changes since v1: > - SHAs for Fixes tag corrected (sorry) > > The size of the DSP host buffer was incorrectly defined as 2ms while > it is 4ms and the ChainDMA PCMs are using 5ms as host facing buffer. > > The constraint will be set against the period time rather than the buffer > time to make sure that application will not face with xruns when the > DMA bursts to refill the host buffer. > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/3] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Correct the minimum host DMA buffer size commit: a7fe5ff832d61d9393095bc3dd5f06f4af7da3c1 [2/3] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-topology: Account for different ChainDMA host buffer size commit: 3dcf683bf1062d69014fe81b90d285c7eb85ca8a [3/3] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-pcm: Place the constraint on period time instead of buffer time commit: 45ad27d9a6f7c620d8bbc80be3bab1faf37dfa0a All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark