From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714C8189BB0; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 21:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749763052; cv=none; b=ffv43jLefTVNS0wUlxbL32fkeijAxRQidGz/iGIavlNxP4GGt1comBNiuflYlsvkQ5lNRaQPWNlCvSCW13z/rlZw9E+F8KacNYEL+e02Tz5yJ42e+jrPV33fJUDwFSo8DzlqqNabOXKy5tyobQGzLaGO3AZOShCouhmbFtO/dGU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749763052; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ULQj/IndkM1c0cZtsKAlkQSqzG5yO/i3mQB5z5aC9wQ=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=knIxxCAqyv628yGwG4FJClI2iM7VjmFGsn6wpCSkpwPMT5ceH9TRvf34tmjG1/QHOOvIh9juHCBg2kfWkQ+j6qkzcMRTRdtiEfFDOKyE08Sb/JjpBlEjtD1e2XobQV9DTyrJkkqYOMF5idBmzGdH2NEcUNYS4P9QZw7jRjt5frg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=priIKhSy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="priIKhSy" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5860FC4CEEA; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 21:17:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1749763051; bh=ULQj/IndkM1c0cZtsKAlkQSqzG5yO/i3mQB5z5aC9wQ=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=priIKhSynhe3LOKjsbfpEaAlJ5iUs3DiDPSow9QMyFvsZlAcO4Weo3zaP80wA8P0w +L9GFn0xIP9F+AFIWZy+u1UoNPFAx3dNQD5J0ThpoCLEnbeWcaOWmZ2euotrZR29vD o0ES1InMy2emevirTDCXtCAB+JXtVYoDQ6UHtgr5s3sDbjwo1a8s18U/Jd1Xm0rU4v kAUAllnTdO10bDY/o0h/302TvzQkOuULhQ+dGwCdQ2ZrLB/iKlXiD9mHDBsbXUUMWW be2/U05lNjxVhRRqPp0cEDqd2L1Xm9dXTOTFipOyYb3bx9PnMBPQZzoE6MZsn9mMOE qiSo+WMexZSDw== From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 00:17:25 +0300 (EEST) To: Sasha Levin , Chia-Yu Chang cc: Eric Dumazet , stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, Neal Cardwell , "David S. Miller" , David Ahern , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Willem de Bruijn Subject: Re: Patch "tcp: reorganize tcp_in_ack_event() and tcp_count_delivered()" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <175e6075-a930-196d-37ce-7f2815141d07@kernel.org> References: <20250522224433.3219290-1-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-184378114-1749763045=:12898" This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-184378114-1749763045=:12898 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE + Chia-Yu On Thu, 12 Jun 2025, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 01:40:57AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 3:44=E2=80=AFPM Sasha Levin = wrote: > > >=20 > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > >=20 > > > tcp: reorganize tcp_in_ack_event() and tcp_count_delivered() > > >=20 > > > to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at: > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/stable/stable-que= ue.git;a=3Dsummary > > >=20 > > > The filename of the patch is: > > > tcp-reorganize-tcp_in_ack_event-and-tcp_count_delive.patch > > > and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory. > > >=20 > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tr= ee, > > > please let know about it. > > >=20 > > >=20 > >=20 > > May I ask why this patch was backported to stable versions ? As you see Eric, you got no answer to a very direct question. I've long since stopped caring unless a change really looks dangerous=20 (this one didn't) what they take into stable, especially since they tend to ignore on-what-grounds questions. > > This is causing a packetdrill test to fail. >=20 > Is this an issue upstream as well? Should we just drop it from stable? It's long since I've done anything with packetdrill so it will take some=20 time for me to test. Maybe Chia-Yu can check this faster (but I assume=20 it's also problem in mainline as this is reported by Eric). --=20 i. --8323328-184378114-1749763045=:12898--