From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:22:01 -0800 From: Greg KH To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [000/262] 3.0.9-stable review Message-ID: <20111110162201.GA2387@suse.de> References: <20111109212847.GA20838@kroah.com> <20111110005406.GA22026@shutemov.name> <20111110031524.GA22180@suse.de> <20111110063534.GA22143@shutemov.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111110063534.GA22143@shutemov.name> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:35:34AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:15:24PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 02:54:07AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 01:28:47PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.9 release. > > > > > > Could you include these two: > > > > > > a94cc4e sfi: table irq 0xFF means 'no interrupt' > > > > Why was this not marked for stable? > > Hm.. I don't know. But the patch was queued for 3.0.5. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/29/357 > > > > 153b19a x86, mrst: use a temporary variable for SFI irq > > > > Odd, I wonder how I missed this one. > > There's dependency on the first patch, but you've forgot our first > conversation, I guess. Yes I have, when dealing with 260+ patches, you tend to forget the conversations of the previous release... greg k-h