From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 08:42:58 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Jonathan Nieder Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, John Stultz , Linus Walleij , Alessandro Zummo , Rabin Vincent , "Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot" , Marco Santos , Christophe Vu-Brugier Subject: Re: [096/104] rtc: Disable the alarm in the hardware Message-ID: <20120103164258.GA26638@suse.de> References: <20111207161246.GA10995@kroah.com> <20111207161222.676101253@clark.kroah.org> <20120103162720.GA22050@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120103162720.GA22050@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:27:20AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Greg KH wrote: > > > 3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Rabin Vincent > > > > commit c0afabd3d553c521e003779c127143ffde55a16f upstream. > > > > Currently, the RTC code does not disable the alarm in the hardware. > > > > This means that after a sequence such as the one below (the files are in the > > RTC sysfs), the box will boot up after 2 minutes even though we've > > asked for the alarm to be turned off. > [...] > > Fix this by disabling the alarm when there are no timers to run. > > Seems to cause a regression. On the affected kernels (e.g., 3.1.5, > 3.1.6, and 3.2-rc7) the patch has exactly the opposite of what you'd > expect --- the affected machines automatically power on a few minutes > after shutdown if and only if the patch is applied. > > The affected machines all seem to be Toshiba Portege laptops. > > Antonio-M. Corbi Bellot: Toshiba Portege R500 > Marco Santos: Toshiba Portege Z830 > Christophe Vu-Brugier: Toshiba Portege R830 > > Christophe tried reverting the above patch and the symptoms went away. > See http://bugs.debian.org/652869 for details. Please consider > reverting the patch from stable until this is resolved. Is it also reverted (or fixed), in Linus's tree as well? thanks, greg k-h