From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:48:51 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Ben Myers Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [41/42] xfs: validate acl count Message-ID: <20120116164851.GA13459@suse.de> References: <20120110215031.GA19398@kroah.com> <20120110215024.482323323@clark.kroah.org> <20120111074135.GA30829@lst.de> <20120111150021.GB23608@suse.de> <20120111150532.GL20739@sgi.com> <20120113161727.GB6519@sgi.com> <20120113181952.GA30393@suse.de> <20120113194218.GB14857@sgi.com> <20120113195206.GA16462@suse.de> <20120116155309.GC14857@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120116155309.GC14857@sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:53:09AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > Hey Greg, > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:52:06AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:42:18PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:19:52AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:17:27AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > > > > Hey Greg, > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:05:32AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > > > > > Hi Christoph & Greg, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 07:00:21AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:41:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:48:51PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > > > 3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just curious, how well tested are all the patches on 2.6.32 and 3.1 hat I only > > > > > > > > submitted for 3.0? I'd really prefer if they at least get an xfstest run > > > > > > > > before they get sent out to the world. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I took these patches on my own as they were reported to fix a public > > > > > > > vulnerability which was assigned a CVE. They applied with no fuzz and > > > > > > > "looked correct" so I applied them on my own. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I shouldn't have, please let me know and I'll drop them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, a nice run of xfstest by someone would be appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a 3.1 test rig and will get this done today, then I'll go after > > > > > > 2.6.32. > > > > > > > > > > I ran xfstests with 'xfs: validate acl count' and 'xfs: fix acl count > > > > > validation in xfs_acl_from_disk()' applied to 3.1-stable. It came out > > > > > ok. I'll get started on 2.6.32. > > > > > > > > Thanks, how about the 3.0 release? > > > > > > HCH would have given them a spin before he sent them to stable@. > > > > You are right, sorry, for some reason I thought that was for 3.1, too > > many different kernel trees at the moment :( > > My v2.6.32.54 test run came out ok too. Wonderful, thanks for testing and letting us know. greg k-h