From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:45:51 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Greg KH Cc: tim.gardner@canonical.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: Latest kernel stable/longterm status Message-ID: <20120121144551.GH7528@1wt.eu> References: <20120110003705.GA9482@kroah.com> <20120110022617.GA11376@home.goodmis.org> <4F0C0CF5.1080706@gmail.com> <20120110235612.GB1507@kroah.com> <4F0D6006.40506@canonical.com> <20120111151218.GB24077@kroah.com> <4F0DF2F3.8080902@canonical.com> <20120111205212.GA18902@kroah.com> <20120121133620.GA10602@1wt.eu> <20120121134706.GA21515@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120121134706.GA21515@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 08:47:06AM -0500, Greg KH wrote: > > Yes I'm still interested in taking over 2.6.32 when you give it up. I > > must admit I've got quite silent last months, slowly trying to find time > > to backport 2.6.32 fixes into .27, and still a bit afraid by the added > > complexity of the new publication model. Time will tell. This weel-end > > I hope to be able to produce 2.6.27.60-rc1. > > > > What is very important to me is that I want people to complain if they > > find that I'm too slow, as I don't want to degrade the quality of the > > stable series by taking a position someone would take better. > > I don't think you will do a bad job at all, You'll do fine, if you need > any help, feel free to ask. Yeah, I know you're always there to help me when I need, this is what keeps me going :-) Cheers, Willy