From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-Id: <20120124023932.950847544@clark.kroah.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:35:21 -0800 From: Greg KH To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, x86@kernel.org, Kurt Garloff , Len Brown Subject: [101/129] ACPI, x86: Use SRAT table rev to use 8bit or 32bit PXM fields (x86/x86-64) In-Reply-To: <20120124024041.GA18422@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ Content-Length: 1483 Lines: 43 From: Kurt Garloff commit cd298f60a2451a16e0f077404bf69b62ec868733 upstream. In SRAT v1, we had 8bit proximity domain (PXM) fields; SRAT v2 provides 32bits for these. The new fields were reserved before. According to the ACPI spec, the OS must disregrard reserved fields. x86/x86-64 was rather inconsistent prior to this patch; it used 8 bits for the pxm field in cpu_affinity, but 32 bits in mem_affinity. This patch makes it consistent: Either use 8 bits consistently (SRAT rev 1 or lower) or 32 bits (SRAT rev 2 or higher). cc: x86@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff Signed-off-by: Len Brown Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/mm/srat.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat.c @@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct if ((pa->flags & ACPI_SRAT_CPU_ENABLED) == 0) return; pxm = pa->proximity_domain_lo; + if (acpi_srat_revision >= 2) + pxm |= *((unsigned int*)pa->proximity_domain_hi) << 8; node = setup_node(pxm); if (node < 0) { printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: Too many proximity domains %x\n", pxm); @@ -155,6 +157,8 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct ac start = ma->base_address; end = start + ma->length; pxm = ma->proximity_domain; + if (acpi_srat_revision <= 1) + pxm &= 0xff; node = setup_node(pxm); if (node < 0) { printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: Too many proximity domains.\n");