From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:09:19 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Herbert Xu Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [06/20] crypto: sha512 - reduce stack usage to safe number Message-ID: <20120202000919.GA7870@kroah.com> References: <20120201210055.GA25374@kroah.com> <20120201201531.599621544@clark.kroah.org> <20120201234208.GA28700@p183.telecom.by> <20120201235204.GA18950@kroah.com> <20120202000450.GA18441@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120202000450.GA18441@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 11:04:51AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:52:04PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > But this patch isn't in Linus's tree yet, right? > > > > So, should I just drop this one for now (well both of them) or just wait > > for the above referenced patch to hit Linus's tree and handle it then? > > We're still working on the i386 issue. However, I'd say that > you should take these two patches now since the problem they > fix is far worse than the potential stack issue on i386. Ok, thanks for letting me know, I'll leave these patches in. greg k-h