From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:47:02 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, lwn@lwn.net,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>, raven@themaw.net
Subject: Re: Build broken on s390 and ia64 [was: Linux 2.6.32.58]
Message-ID: <20120308114702.GA21607@1wt.eu>
References: <20120304180911.GA7336@kroah.com> <4F54A46A.6000305@suse.cz> <20120305120241.GA3627@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <4F54B618.1090301@suse.cz> <20120305223338.GE2930@1wt.eu> <4F5892B1.3070008@suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F5892B1.3070008@suse.cz>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 12:06:25PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > So in the end, does anybody have an idea what is missing from this patch ?
> > I'm not sure that reverting the autofs fix is a right solution either :-/
> 
> Nobody relevant? Hmm... I use the attached patch. If there are no
> objections, I will add a header there and send to Willy.

Thanks Jiri !
I will probably publish a new review this week-end.

Willy