From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-Id: <20120528031214.469676457@decadent.org.uk> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 04:13:26 +0100 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Dan Carpenter , Jeff Layton , Steve French Subject: [ 084/117] cifs: fix revalidation test in cifs_llseek() In-Reply-To: <20120528031202.829379252@decadent.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dan Carpenter commit 48a5730e5b71201e226ff06e245bf308feba5f10 upstream. This test is always true so it means we revalidate the length every time, which generates more network traffic. When it is SEEK_SET or SEEK_CUR, then we don't need to revalidate. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Steve French Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c index ca6a379..541ef81 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static loff_t cifs_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin) * origin == SEEK_END || SEEK_DATA || SEEK_HOLE => we must revalidate * the cached file length */ - if (origin != SEEK_SET || origin != SEEK_CUR) { + if (origin != SEEK_SET && origin != SEEK_CUR) { int rc; struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;