From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-Id: <20120528031216.379775219@decadent.org.uk> Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 04:13:40 +0100 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Dave Airlie , Ben Skeggs Subject: [ 098/117] nouveau: nouveau_set_bo_placement takes TTM flags In-Reply-To: <20120528031202.829379252@decadent.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dave Airlie commit c284815debba2f14ee2fd07b1b4cc972ab116110 upstream. This seems to be wrong to me, spotted while thinking about dma-buf. Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c index 7d15a77..12ce044 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ nouveau_ttm_fault_reserve_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo) nvbo->placement.fpfn = 0; nvbo->placement.lpfn = dev_priv->fb_mappable_pages; - nouveau_bo_placement_set(nvbo, TTM_PL_VRAM, 0); + nouveau_bo_placement_set(nvbo, TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM, 0); return nouveau_bo_validate(nvbo, false, true, false); }