From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-Id: <20120607040342.314328886@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:04:17 +0900 From: Greg KH To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: [ 41/82] x86, x32, ptrace: Remove PTRACE_ARCH_PRCTL for x32 In-Reply-To: <20120607041406.GA13233@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: "H.J. Lu" commit bad1a753d4d4deb09d4bc0bac1dd4fc3298502e9 upstream. When I added x32 ptrace to 3.4 kernel, I also include PTRACE_ARCH_PRCTL support for x32 GDB For ARCH_GET_FS/GS, it takes a pointer to int64. But at user level, ARCH_GET_FS/GS takes a pointer to int32. So I have to add x32 ptrace to glibc to handle it with a temporary int64 passed to kernel and copy it back to GDB as int32. Roland suggested that PTRACE_ARCH_PRCTL is obsolete and x32 GDB should use fs_base and gs_base fields of user_regs_struct instead. Accordingly, remove PTRACE_ARCH_PRCTL completely from the x32 code to avoid possible memory overrun when pointer to int32 is passed to kernel. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAMe9rOpDzHfS7NH7m1vmD9QRw8SSj4Sc%2BaNOgcWm_WJME2eRsQ@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -1211,12 +1211,6 @@ static long x32_arch_ptrace(struct task_ 0, sizeof(struct user_i387_struct), datap); - /* normal 64bit interface to access TLS data. - Works just like arch_prctl, except that the arguments - are reversed. */ - case PTRACE_ARCH_PRCTL: - return do_arch_prctl(child, data, addr); - default: return compat_ptrace_request(child, request, addr, data); }