[ 16/61] tracing: Have tracing_off() actually turn tracing off

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>

commit f2bf1f6f5f89d031245067512449fc889b2f4bb2 upstream.

A recent update to have tracing_on/off() only affect the ftrace ring
buffers instead of all ring buffers had a cut and paste error.
The tracing_off() did the exact same thing as tracing_on() and
would not actually turn off tracing. Unfortunately, tracing_off()
is more important to be working than tracing_on() as this is a key
development tool, as it lets the developer turn off tracing as soon
as a problem is discovered. It is also used by panic and oops code.

This bug also breaks the 'echo func:traceoff > set_ftrace_filter'

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/trace/trace.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracing_on);
 void tracing_off(void)
 {
 	if (global_trace.buffer)
-		ring_buffer_record_on(global_trace.buffer);
+		ring_buffer_record_off(global_trace.buffer);
 	/*
 	 * This flag is only looked at when buffers haven't been
 	 * allocated yet. We don't really care about the race