From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-Id: <20120620173022.432073059@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:30:37 -0700 From: Greg KH To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Hans de Bruin , Joerg Platte , Jeff Layton , Trond Myklebust Subject: [ 17/61] rpc_pipefs: allow rpc_purge_list to take a NULL waitq pointer In-Reply-To: <20120620173033.GA5634@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jeff Layton commit 92123e068efa310b09e9943ac1cfd10ff6b6d2e4 upstream. In the event that we don't have a dentry for a rpc_pipefs pipe, we still need to allow the queue_timeout job to clean out the queue. There's just no waitq to wake up in that event. Reported-by: Hans de Bruin Reported-by: Joerg Platte Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c @@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ static void rpc_purge_list(wait_queue_he msg->errno = err; destroy_msg(msg); } while (!list_empty(head)); - wake_up(waitq); + + if (waitq) + wake_up(waitq); } static void @@ -91,11 +93,9 @@ rpc_timeout_upcall_queue(struct work_str } dentry = dget(pipe->dentry); spin_unlock(&pipe->lock); - if (dentry) { - rpc_purge_list(&RPC_I(dentry->d_inode)->waitq, - &free_list, destroy_msg, -ETIMEDOUT); - dput(dentry); - } + rpc_purge_list(dentry ? &RPC_I(dentry->d_inode)->waitq : NULL, + &free_list, destroy_msg, -ETIMEDOUT); + dput(dentry); } ssize_t rpc_pipe_generic_upcall(struct file *filp, struct rpc_pipe_msg *msg,