* [patch] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207091209220.3050@tux.localdomain>
@ 2012-07-09 10:36 ` David Rientjes
2012-07-09 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2012-07-09 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: JoonSoo Kim, Fengguang Wu, Vegard Nossum, Christoph Lameter, Rus,
Ben Hutchings, Steven Rostedt, stable, linux-mm, linux-kernel
kmemcheck_alloc_shadow() requires irqs to be enabled, so wait to disable
them until after its called for __GFP_WAIT allocations.
This fixes a warning for such allocations:
WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2739 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x14e/0x1c0()
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.1+]
Acked-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1314,13 +1314,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK);
}
- if (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
- local_irq_disable();
-
- if (!page)
- return NULL;
-
- if (kmemcheck_enabled
+ if (page && kmemcheck_enabled
&& !(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK | DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS))) {
int pages = 1 << oo_order(oo);
@@ -1336,6 +1330,11 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
kmemcheck_mark_unallocated_pages(page, pages);
}
+ if (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
+ local_irq_disable();
+ if (!page)
+ return NULL;
+
page->objects = oo_objects(oo);
mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page),
(s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck
2012-07-09 10:36 ` [patch] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck David Rientjes
@ 2012-07-09 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-07-09 14:06 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-09 21:00 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2012-07-09 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Pekka Enberg, JoonSoo Kim, Fengguang Wu, Vegard Nossum,
Christoph Lameter, Rus, Ben Hutchings, stable, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 03:36 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> kmemcheck_alloc_shadow() requires irqs to be enabled, so wait to disable
> them until after its called for __GFP_WAIT allocations.
>
> This fixes a warning for such allocations:
>
> WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2739 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x14e/0x1c0()
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.1+]
> Acked-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1314,13 +1314,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
> stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK);
> }
>
> - if (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
> - local_irq_disable();
> -
> - if (!page)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - if (kmemcheck_enabled
> + if (page && kmemcheck_enabled
One micro-optimization nit...
If kmemcheck_enabled is mostly false, and page is mostly true, wouldn't
it be better to swap the two?
if (kmemcheck_enabled && page
Then the first check would just short-circuit out and we don't do the
double check.
Otherwise it looks good.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-- Steve
> && !(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK | DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS))) {
> int pages = 1 << oo_order(oo);
>
> @@ -1336,6 +1330,11 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
> kmemcheck_mark_unallocated_pages(page, pages);
> }
>
> + if (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
> + local_irq_disable();
> + if (!page)
> + return NULL;
> +
> page->objects = oo_objects(oo);
> mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page),
> (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck
2012-07-09 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2012-07-09 14:06 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-09 21:00 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2012-07-09 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt
Cc: David Rientjes, Pekka Enberg, JoonSoo Kim, Vegard Nossum,
Christoph Lameter, Rus, Ben Hutchings, stable, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:46:33AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 03:36 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > kmemcheck_alloc_shadow() requires irqs to be enabled, so wait to disable
> > them until after its called for __GFP_WAIT allocations.
> >
> > This fixes a warning for such allocations:
> >
> > WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2739 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x14e/0x1c0()
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.1+]
> > Acked-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > ---
> > mm/slub.c | 13 ++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -1314,13 +1314,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
> > stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK);
> > }
> >
> > - if (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
> > - local_irq_disable();
> > -
> > - if (!page)
> > - return NULL;
> > -
> > - if (kmemcheck_enabled
> > + if (page && kmemcheck_enabled
>
> One micro-optimization nit...
>
> If kmemcheck_enabled is mostly false, and page is mostly true, wouldn't
> it be better to swap the two?
>
> if (kmemcheck_enabled && page
>
> Then the first check would just short-circuit out and we don't do the
> double check.
I had the same gut feeling but at the time was not as conscious as you ;)
Now I can dig out a similar optimization by Andrew Morton which also
saves memory bytes:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:00:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
: With my gcc and CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=n (for gawd's sake can we
: please rename this to CONFIG_MEMCG?), this:
:
: --- a/mm/vmscan.c~memcg-prevent-from-oom-with-too-many-dirty-pages-fix
: +++ a/mm/vmscan.c
: @@ -726,8 +726,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(st
: * writeback from reclaim and there is nothing else to
: * reclaim.
: */
: - if (PageReclaim(page)
: - && may_enter_fs && !global_reclaim(sc))
: + if (!global_reclaim(sc) && PageReclaim(page) &&
: + may_enter_fs)
: wait_on_page_writeback(page);
: else {
: nr_writeback++;
:
:
: reduces vmscan.o's .text by 48 bytes(!). Because the compiler can
: avoid generating any code for PageReclaim() and perhaps the
: may_enter_fs test. Because global_reclaim() evaluates to constant
: true. Do you think that's an improvement?
Thanks,
Fengguang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [patch v2] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck
2012-07-09 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-07-09 14:06 ` Fengguang Wu
@ 2012-07-09 21:00 ` David Rientjes
2012-07-10 19:44 ` Pekka Enberg
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2012-07-09 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Steven Rostedt, JoonSoo Kim, Fengguang Wu, Vegard Nossum,
Christoph Lameter, Rus, Ben Hutchings, stable, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
kmemcheck_alloc_shadow() requires irqs to be enabled, so wait to disable
them until after its called for __GFP_WAIT allocations.
This fixes a warning for such allocations:
WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2739 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x14e/0x1c0()
Acked-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1314,13 +1314,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK);
}
- if (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
- local_irq_disable();
-
- if (!page)
- return NULL;
-
- if (kmemcheck_enabled
+ if (kmemcheck_enabled && page
&& !(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK | DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS))) {
int pages = 1 << oo_order(oo);
@@ -1336,6 +1330,11 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
kmemcheck_mark_unallocated_pages(page, pages);
}
+ if (flags & __GFP_WAIT)
+ local_irq_disable();
+ if (!page)
+ return NULL;
+
page->objects = oo_objects(oo);
mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page),
(s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch v2] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck
2012-07-09 21:00 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
@ 2012-07-10 19:44 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2012-07-10 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Rientjes
Cc: Steven Rostedt, JoonSoo Kim, Fengguang Wu, Vegard Nossum,
Christoph Lameter, Rus, Ben Hutchings, stable, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> kmemcheck_alloc_shadow() requires irqs to be enabled, so wait to disable
> them until after its called for __GFP_WAIT allocations.
>
> This fixes a warning for such allocations:
>
> WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2739 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x14e/0x1c0()
>
> Acked-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Applied, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-10 19:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20120708040009.GA8363@localhost>
[not found] ` <CAAmzW4OD2_ODyeY7c1VMPajwzovOms5M8Vnw=XP=uGUyPogiJQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1207081558540.18461@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207091209220.3050@tux.localdomain>
2012-07-09 10:36 ` [patch] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck David Rientjes
2012-07-09 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-07-09 14:06 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-07-09 21:00 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2012-07-10 19:44 ` Pekka Enberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).