* [patch] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck [not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207091209220.3050@tux.localdomain> @ 2012-07-09 10:36 ` David Rientjes 2012-07-09 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2012-07-09 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pekka Enberg Cc: JoonSoo Kim, Fengguang Wu, Vegard Nossum, Christoph Lameter, Rus, Ben Hutchings, Steven Rostedt, stable, linux-mm, linux-kernel kmemcheck_alloc_shadow() requires irqs to be enabled, so wait to disable them until after its called for __GFP_WAIT allocations. This fixes a warning for such allocations: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2739 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x14e/0x1c0() Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.1+] Acked-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> --- mm/slub.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c @@ -1314,13 +1314,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK); } - if (flags & __GFP_WAIT) - local_irq_disable(); - - if (!page) - return NULL; - - if (kmemcheck_enabled + if (page && kmemcheck_enabled && !(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK | DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS))) { int pages = 1 << oo_order(oo); @@ -1336,6 +1330,11 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) kmemcheck_mark_unallocated_pages(page, pages); } + if (flags & __GFP_WAIT) + local_irq_disable(); + if (!page) + return NULL; + page->objects = oo_objects(oo); mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck 2012-07-09 10:36 ` [patch] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck David Rientjes @ 2012-07-09 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt 2012-07-09 14:06 ` Fengguang Wu 2012-07-09 21:00 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Steven Rostedt @ 2012-07-09 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg, JoonSoo Kim, Fengguang Wu, Vegard Nossum, Christoph Lameter, Rus, Ben Hutchings, stable, linux-mm, linux-kernel On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 03:36 -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > kmemcheck_alloc_shadow() requires irqs to be enabled, so wait to disable > them until after its called for __GFP_WAIT allocations. > > This fixes a warning for such allocations: > > WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2739 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x14e/0x1c0() > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.1+] > Acked-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > --- > mm/slub.c | 13 ++++++------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > --- a/mm/slub.c > +++ b/mm/slub.c > @@ -1314,13 +1314,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) > stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK); > } > > - if (flags & __GFP_WAIT) > - local_irq_disable(); > - > - if (!page) > - return NULL; > - > - if (kmemcheck_enabled > + if (page && kmemcheck_enabled One micro-optimization nit... If kmemcheck_enabled is mostly false, and page is mostly true, wouldn't it be better to swap the two? if (kmemcheck_enabled && page Then the first check would just short-circuit out and we don't do the double check. Otherwise it looks good. Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> -- Steve > && !(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK | DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS))) { > int pages = 1 << oo_order(oo); > > @@ -1336,6 +1330,11 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) > kmemcheck_mark_unallocated_pages(page, pages); > } > > + if (flags & __GFP_WAIT) > + local_irq_disable(); > + if (!page) > + return NULL; > + > page->objects = oo_objects(oo); > mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), > (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck 2012-07-09 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt @ 2012-07-09 14:06 ` Fengguang Wu 2012-07-09 21:00 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2012-07-09 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steven Rostedt Cc: David Rientjes, Pekka Enberg, JoonSoo Kim, Vegard Nossum, Christoph Lameter, Rus, Ben Hutchings, stable, linux-mm, linux-kernel On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:46:33AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 03:36 -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > kmemcheck_alloc_shadow() requires irqs to be enabled, so wait to disable > > them until after its called for __GFP_WAIT allocations. > > > > This fixes a warning for such allocations: > > > > WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2739 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x14e/0x1c0() > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.1+] > > Acked-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > > Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > > --- > > mm/slub.c | 13 ++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c > > --- a/mm/slub.c > > +++ b/mm/slub.c > > @@ -1314,13 +1314,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) > > stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK); > > } > > > > - if (flags & __GFP_WAIT) > > - local_irq_disable(); > > - > > - if (!page) > > - return NULL; > > - > > - if (kmemcheck_enabled > > + if (page && kmemcheck_enabled > > One micro-optimization nit... > > If kmemcheck_enabled is mostly false, and page is mostly true, wouldn't > it be better to swap the two? > > if (kmemcheck_enabled && page > > Then the first check would just short-circuit out and we don't do the > double check. I had the same gut feeling but at the time was not as conscious as you ;) Now I can dig out a similar optimization by Andrew Morton which also saves memory bytes: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:00:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: : With my gcc and CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=n (for gawd's sake can we : please rename this to CONFIG_MEMCG?), this: : : --- a/mm/vmscan.c~memcg-prevent-from-oom-with-too-many-dirty-pages-fix : +++ a/mm/vmscan.c : @@ -726,8 +726,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(st : * writeback from reclaim and there is nothing else to : * reclaim. : */ : - if (PageReclaim(page) : - && may_enter_fs && !global_reclaim(sc)) : + if (!global_reclaim(sc) && PageReclaim(page) && : + may_enter_fs) : wait_on_page_writeback(page); : else { : nr_writeback++; : : : reduces vmscan.o's .text by 48 bytes(!). Because the compiler can : avoid generating any code for PageReclaim() and perhaps the : may_enter_fs test. Because global_reclaim() evaluates to constant : true. Do you think that's an improvement? Thanks, Fengguang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [patch v2] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck 2012-07-09 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt 2012-07-09 14:06 ` Fengguang Wu @ 2012-07-09 21:00 ` David Rientjes 2012-07-10 19:44 ` Pekka Enberg 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: David Rientjes @ 2012-07-09 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Steven Rostedt, JoonSoo Kim, Fengguang Wu, Vegard Nossum, Christoph Lameter, Rus, Ben Hutchings, stable, linux-mm, linux-kernel kmemcheck_alloc_shadow() requires irqs to be enabled, so wait to disable them until after its called for __GFP_WAIT allocations. This fixes a warning for such allocations: WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2739 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x14e/0x1c0() Acked-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> --- mm/slub.c | 13 ++++++------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c @@ -1314,13 +1314,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK); } - if (flags & __GFP_WAIT) - local_irq_disable(); - - if (!page) - return NULL; - - if (kmemcheck_enabled + if (kmemcheck_enabled && page && !(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK | DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS))) { int pages = 1 << oo_order(oo); @@ -1336,6 +1330,11 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node) kmemcheck_mark_unallocated_pages(page, pages); } + if (flags & __GFP_WAIT) + local_irq_disable(); + if (!page) + return NULL; + page->objects = oo_objects(oo); mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch v2] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck 2012-07-09 21:00 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes @ 2012-07-10 19:44 ` Pekka Enberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Pekka Enberg @ 2012-07-10 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Rientjes Cc: Steven Rostedt, JoonSoo Kim, Fengguang Wu, Vegard Nossum, Christoph Lameter, Rus, Ben Hutchings, stable, linux-mm, linux-kernel On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, David Rientjes wrote: > kmemcheck_alloc_shadow() requires irqs to be enabled, so wait to disable > them until after its called for __GFP_WAIT allocations. > > This fixes a warning for such allocations: > > WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2739 lockdep_trace_alloc+0x14e/0x1c0() > > Acked-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Applied, thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-10 19:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <20120708040009.GA8363@localhost> [not found] ` <CAAmzW4OD2_ODyeY7c1VMPajwzovOms5M8Vnw=XP=uGUyPogiJQ@mail.gmail.com> [not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1207081558540.18461@chino.kir.corp.google.com> [not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.02.1207091209220.3050@tux.localdomain> 2012-07-09 10:36 ` [patch] mm, slub: ensure irqs are enabled for kmemcheck David Rientjes 2012-07-09 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt 2012-07-09 14:06 ` Fengguang Wu 2012-07-09 21:00 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes 2012-07-10 19:44 ` Pekka Enberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).