From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:07:38 +0100 From: Mariusz Kozlowski To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [ 00/27] 3.7.1-stable review Message-ID: <20121217220738.GA3542@mako-laptop> References: <20121214222251.229078963@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121214222251.229078963@linuxfoundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:01:13PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.7.1 release. > There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 16 22:16:56 UTC 2012. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.7.1-rc1.gz > and the diffstat can be found below. Greg, would that be a problem to send these patches for review to linux-3.7.y branch and mark them with v3.7.1-rc1 commit/tag? Is something goes wrong there is still place to fix/revert as needed. If not do the final commit/tag that says this is v3.7.1 [1]. It would be easier to automate things by just monitoring linux-stable remote for new tags. [1] linux-3.7.y is just an example here Regards, -- Mariusz Kozlowski