From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Yan, Zheng" , Sage Weil Subject: [ 215/221] ceph: Dont add dirty inode to dirty list if caps is in migration Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:52:22 -0800 Message-Id: <20130115185013.565129949@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20130115184958.025580322@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20130115184958.025580322@linuxfoundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 3.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: "Yan, Zheng" (cherry picked from commit 0685235ffd9dbdb9ccbda587f8a3c83ad1d5a921) Add dirty inode to cap_dirty_migrating list instead, this can avoid ceph_flush_dirty_caps() entering infinite loop. Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng Signed-off-by: Sage Weil Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/ceph/caps.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/fs/ceph/caps.c +++ b/fs/ceph/caps.c @@ -1349,11 +1349,15 @@ int __ceph_mark_dirty_caps(struct ceph_i if (!ci->i_head_snapc) ci->i_head_snapc = ceph_get_snap_context( ci->i_snap_realm->cached_context); - dout(" inode %p now dirty snapc %p\n", &ci->vfs_inode, - ci->i_head_snapc); + dout(" inode %p now dirty snapc %p auth cap %p\n", + &ci->vfs_inode, ci->i_head_snapc, ci->i_auth_cap); BUG_ON(!list_empty(&ci->i_dirty_item)); spin_lock(&mdsc->cap_dirty_lock); - list_add(&ci->i_dirty_item, &mdsc->cap_dirty); + if (ci->i_auth_cap) + list_add(&ci->i_dirty_item, &mdsc->cap_dirty); + else + list_add(&ci->i_dirty_item, + &mdsc->cap_dirty_migrating); spin_unlock(&mdsc->cap_dirty_lock); if (ci->i_flushing_caps == 0) { ihold(inode);