From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:31:09 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Rusty Russell Cc: Prarit Bhargava , Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: module: put modules in list much earlier. Message-ID: <20130124183109.GG12106@kroah.com> References: <20130121014613.CF6ED660735@gitolite.kernel.org> <20130121201221.GA8149@kroah.com> <87mww2uqpy.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mww2uqpy.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:46:25AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > Greg KH writes: > > Rusty, should the commit below be applied to the 3.7-stable kernel tree? > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Good point. looks like commit which caused this (e9bda3b) went in 3.6 > so I think you'll want the following: > > 0d21b0e3477395e7ff2acc269f15df6e6a8d356d module: add new state MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED > 1fb9341ac34825aa40354e74d9a2c69df7d2c304 module: put modules in list much earlier. > ee61abb3223e28a1a14a8429c0319755d20d3e40 module: fix missing module_mutex unlock Thanks, the second one required a bit of tweaking by hand, but it looks good now, all applied. greg k-h