From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:37:51 +0100
From: William Dauchy <william@gandi.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: William Dauchy <william@gandi.net>, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ian.campbell@citrix.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
	"Christopher S. Aker" <caker@theshore.net>
Subject: Re: xen-netback fixes for stable 35876b5 3e55f8b
Message-ID: <20130222173751.GE27794@gandi.net>
References: <20130222164728.GB27794@gandi.net>
 <20130222170827.GB5126@kroah.com>
 <20130222171754.GD27794@gandi.net>
 <20130222172844.GA15983@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZsxMXj7gRnSZQ7B8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130222172844.GA15983@kroah.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>


--ZsxMXj7gRnSZQ7B8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb22 09:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> What does that mean?  Should they be applied for those kernels or not?

Yes indeed.
Sorry for my confused answer.

Thanks,
--=20
William

--ZsxMXj7gRnSZQ7B8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlEnrO8ACgkQ1I6eqOUidQHHUwCeJmWiyjG3iX0iF6XJmuU8GdwZ
/6QAn1uW4P6UCapc5xkbmn+jDBclJqJq
=JELT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZsxMXj7gRnSZQ7B8--