From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:20:28 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Johan Hovold Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov , Nicolas Ferre , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , Imre Kaloz , Krzysztof Halasa , Eric Miao , Haojian Zhuang , Daniel Mack , Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= , Andrew Morton , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: w1-gpio: fix erroneous gpio requests Message-ID: <20130312202028.GA6060@kroah.com> References: <1363116094-8630-1-git-send-email-jhovold@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363116094-8630-1-git-send-email-jhovold@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:21:34PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > Fix regression introduced by commit d2323cf773 ("onewire: w1-gpio: add > ext_pullup_enable pin in platform data") which added a gpio entry to the > platform data, but did not add the required initialisers to the board > files using it. Consequently, the driver would request gpio 0 at probe, > which could break other uses of the corresponding pin. > > On AT91 requesting gpio 0 changes the pin muxing for PIOA0, which, for > instance, breaks SPI0 on at91sam9g20. > > Cc: stable > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold > --- > > Not sure whose tree this should go in through, so adding relevant maintainers > and authors as CC. As I took the offending patch, I might as well take this fix for it as well. Unless anyone else objects? thanks, greg k-h