From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
To: PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com, Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 150/150] kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA_RESTORER
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:16:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130327151607.GA17221@hercules> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515307E5.8858.4BC860B3@pageexec.freemail.hu>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:53:25PM +0100, PaX Team wrote:
> sorry if you got this twice, had smtpd problems...
>
> On 26 Mar 2013 at 15:20, Luis Henriques wrote:
>
> > 3.5.7.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >
> > commit 522cff142d7d2f9230839c9e1f21a4d8bcc22a4a upstream.
> >
> > __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER is the preferred conditional for use in 3.9 and
> > later kernels, per Kees.
>
> does __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER exist in the 3.5 stable series at all? i thought it
> was new to 3.9...
You're right, __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER has been added on 3.9 only.
However, due to build failures for some archs (mips, ia64, ...) using
the upstream 2ca39528c01a933f6689cd6505ce65bd6d68a530 commit, Ben
Hutchings has cooked a patch that adds this definition to stable
series.
This patch is currently under review for the 3.5 kernel:
[PATCH 149/150] signal: Define __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER so we know whether to clear sa_restorer
Cheers,
--
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-27 14:53 [PATCH 150/150] kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA_RESTORER PaX Team
2013-03-27 15:16 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-26 15:18 [ 3.5.y.z extended stable ] Linux 3.5.7.9 stable review Luis Henriques
2013-03-26 15:20 ` [PATCH 150/150] kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA_RESTORER Luis Henriques
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130327151607.GA17221@hercules \
--to=luis.henriques@canonical.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jln@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
--cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).