public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.8-stable] ARM: 7690/1: mm: fix CONFIG_LPAE typos
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:01:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130425090147.GD12848@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366878044.1349.19.camel@x61.thuisdomein>

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:20:44AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 17:02 +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
> > it?
> 
> That would be only the setup.c chunk. That fixes a typo introduced in
> v3.4 (see commit e5ab85800820edd907d3f43f285e1232f84d5a41
> ("ARM: 7382/1: mm: truncate memory banks to fit in 4GB space for classic
> MMU")). So, if that chunk is deemed appropriate for stable, you could
> consider the v3.4.y longterm tree too.

Even then, I don't think it's worth backporting this patch. membank->start
and membank->size are phys_addr_t, so with LPAE enabled, this check won't
trigger anyway. The #ifndef is just there for readability really (since the
printk message explicitly refers to 32-bit physical addresses).

So I wouldn't bother with this.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-25  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-07 23:02 [RESEND PATCH 3.8-stable] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix crash on soft reset on EXYNOS5440 Jonghwan Choi
2013-04-25  0:16 ` [PATCH 3.8-stable] ARM: 7699/1: sched_clock: Add more notrace to prevent Jonghwan Choi
2013-04-25  0:26   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-04-25  8:02 ` [PATCH 3.8-stable] ARM: 7690/1: mm: fix CONFIG_LPAE typos Jonghwan Choi
2013-04-25  8:20   ` Paul Bolle
2013-04-25  9:01     ` Will Deacon [this message]
2013-04-30  7:52 ` [PATCH 3.8-stable] lib/int_sqrt.c: optimize square root algorithm Jonghwan Choi
2013-04-30 17:32   ` Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130425090147.GD12848@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=jhbird.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox