From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Don't allow unusual PEBS raw flags
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 13:04:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130507110415.GA20999@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130507084803.GD9688@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 08:48:05AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Also, this code only runs when the event is set up, so a bit of sanity
> > checking can only help, right?
>
> Nah, its all very circumspect. In fact; while what Andi states is 'true':
>
> > documentation in the Intel SDM 18.6.1.1 states:
> >
> > """
> > PEBS events are only valid when the following fields of IA32_PERFEVTSELx are all
> > zero: AnyThread, Edge, Invert, CMask.
> > """
>
> It is also true that Intel themselves gave us events that contradict this; look
> at the intel_pebs_aliases*() functions.
>
> This patch would make it impossible to manually create those events.
I missed that bit of obfuscation ...
> Further, there's something entirely different behind this.
Ok, I agree with you, this needs to be fully explained.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-07 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 23:04 [PATCH 1/2] Fix perf LBR filtering Andi Kleen
2013-04-24 23:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Don't allow unusual PEBS raw flags Andi Kleen
2013-04-29 22:16 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-04-29 22:34 ` Andi Kleen
2013-04-29 23:05 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-02 7:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-06 17:44 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-06 18:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-06 22:43 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-07 6:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-07 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-07 11:04 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-05-07 8:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-24 23:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] Fix perf LBR filtering Ben Hutchings
2013-04-24 23:24 ` Greg KH
2013-04-25 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-25 16:41 ` Andi Kleen
2013-04-25 16:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-25 17:00 ` Andi Kleen
2013-04-25 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-25 17:42 ` Andi Kleen
2013-04-26 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-26 19:46 ` Andi Kleen
2013-05-01 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-01 11:55 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130507110415.GA20999@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox