From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 13:14:44 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Dave Kleikamp Cc: Jonghwan Choi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, 'Vahram Martirosyan' Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.9-stable] jfs: Several bugs in jfs_freeze() and jfs_unfreeze() Message-ID: <20130605201444.GA13713@kroah.com> References: <000001ce60c9$622de130$2689a390$%choi@samsung.com> <51AF3CCE.1060908@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51AF3CCE.1060908@oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:27:42AM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On 06/03/2013 09:15 PM, Jonghwan Choi wrote: > > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply > > it? > > I'm kind of on the fence on this one. I believe the failure here was > triggered by induced errors to check the error paths. I'm not aware of a > real-world crash due to the problem being fixed here. Of course, it's > possible, but I don't think it's very likely. Thanks for letting us know, I'll not apply it. greg k-h