From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:08:25 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KS Topic request: Handling the Stable kernel, let's dump the cc:
 stable tag
Message-ID: <20130715230825.GA1739@kroah.com>
References: <1373916476.2748.69.camel@dabdike>
 <20130715214422.GA2478@kroah.com>
 <20130715215504.GA3029@kroah.com>
 <51E4712E.5010501@zytor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51E4712E.5010501@zytor.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 03:01:18PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Perhaps the KS topic should be about different stable workflows and what
> the maintainers' options are, rather than about a specific proposal.
> This seems like a good discussion topic.

I agree, that sounds good to me.

greg k-h