From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:04:47 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Darren Hart , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Willy Tarreau , stable , Chris Ball , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] How to act on LKML Message-ID: <20130717080447.GB5585@mwanda> References: <20130715195316.GF15531@xanatos> <20130715204135.GH15531@xanatos> <1373926109.17876.221.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130715223615.GI15531@xanatos> <1373932170.28142.24.camel@envy.home> <864nbv9qcm.fsf@void.printf.net> <1373944014.17876.255.camel@gandalf.local.home> <51E4BFA9.1030600@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 04:49:27PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > The etiquette on the lkml is by far the roughest of them all. It's the > "bad neighborhood with guns" of the Open Source world. You never know > when you are going to get a bullet, but sooner or later you'll get one. Only Andrew Morton actually reads LKML. These days kernel dev work takes place on subsystem lists. I wonder if some mailing lists are worse than others? From what I have seen people are mostly civil. regards, dan carpenter