From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:27:20 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ 00/74] 3.10.10-stable review Message-ID: <20130827222720.GA27592@kroah.com> References: <20130827010424.535365435@linuxfoundation.org> <521C2BA7.2010705@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <521C2BA7.2010705@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 09:31:35PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 08/26/2013 06:07 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.10 release. > > There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu Aug 29 01:03:56 UTC 2013. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.10-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > Cross build results: > total: 85 pass: 85 fail: 0 > Compared to 3.10.8: > total: 76 pass: 76 fail: 0 > > qemu tests: > arm, microblaze, mips, mips64, ppc, x86, x86_64: pass (boot to login prompt) > > Note that the arm qemu test now passes because I found a workaround for the bug > causing the failure observed with the previous release, not because the bug was fixed. Ah, but at least it doesn't fail now :) > More builds, more platforms tested, still no failures. Results look good. Thanks for testing all 3 of these kernels and letting me know. greg k-h