From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:39:48 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ 00/14] 3.4.61-stable review Message-ID: <20130906163948.GB17541@kroah.com> References: <20130905202614.354156084@linuxfoundation.org> <20130905225628.GB1358@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130905225628.GB1358@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:56:28PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 01:28:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.61 release. > > There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat Sep 7 20:25:41 UTC 2013. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.61-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > buildbot says: > total: 93 pass: 80 skipped: 8 fail: 5 > This matches the test results for the previous release. Hm, did we ever figure out how to fix those 5 failures? Or have we just given up on them for now (which is fine by me.) > qemu test runs for microblaze, mips, mips64, ppc, x86, and x86_64 are also fine. Thanks for testing and letting me know. greg k-h