From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:40:07 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ 00/36] 3.10.11-stable review Message-ID: <20130906164007.GC17541@kroah.com> References: <20130905202702.289738686@linuxfoundation.org> <20130905225922.GC1358@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130905225922.GC1358@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:59:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 01:27:29PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.11 release. > > There are 36 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat Sep 7 20:26:25 UTC 2013. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.11-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > buildbot says: > total: 100 pass: 100 skipped: 0 fail: 0 > Just like the previous release, this is a perfect result. Time to add some > failing builds to raise the challenge ? Heh, no, I like it as-is :) > qemu test runs for arm, microblaze, mips, mips64, ppc, x86, and x86_64 are fine. Thanks for testing and letting me know. greg k-h