From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:06 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [ 00/14] 3.4.61-stable review Message-ID: <20130906184606.GB5274@kroah.com> References: <20130905202614.354156084@linuxfoundation.org> <522A1515.8090300@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <522A1515.8090300@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:47:01AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 09/05/2013 02:28 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.61 release. > >There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >let me know. > > > >Responses should be made by Sat Sep 7 20:25:41 UTC 2013. > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.61-rc1.gz > >and the diffstat can be found below. > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > > >------------- > > > 3.4.61-rc1 applied cleanly to 3.4.60 > > Compiled and booted on the following systems: > > Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 > HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics > > dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for > this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No > regressions in warn. Thanks for testing and letting me know. > Compile tested on Samsung Chromebook Exynos5 (ARMv7): > 3.4.60 compile fail - it is not a regression. Existing issue in > 3.4.y It has to do with missing config selections in > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig for this system. Debugging now using > the Kconfig selections from 3.10.y for this file. Is there a patch I can backport for this to work properly? I'd like to get some type of ARM coverage if possible. thanks, greg k-h