From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:03:47 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , stable , "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [ 00/16] 3.11.1-stable review Message-ID: <20130913230347.GA5211@kroah.com> References: <20130912181156.173326121@linuxfoundation.org> <20130912182240.GA10404@kroah.com> <20130912182730.GA11890@kroah.com> <523398D1.1070106@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <523398D1.1070106@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 04:59:29PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 09/12/2013 12:27 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:22:40AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >>On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:18:40AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >>>On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Linus Torvalds > >>> wrote: > >>>>Your script may be a bit buggered... > >>> > >>>Or maybe I should take that as a sign that 3.11 is doing really well? > >>> > >>>I'll be optimistic. > >> > >>Hm, something went wrong here, let me track it down... > > > >Ok, that was my fault, was working off of a 'master' branch in a repo > >that expected it to be on the linux-3.11.y branch. Here's the real > >pseudo-shortlog below. > > > >And it is short for now, as I've been holding off on applying patches > >that are in your tree until 3.12-rc1 comes out. The patches here are > >ones that people have pointed out to me that should go in specifically > >for various reasons. So yes, I do think 3.11 is doing really well, I > >have not heard of anything "major" being wrong with it yet. > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > > > > > 3.11.1-rc1 applied cleanly to 3.11 > > Compiled and booted on the following systems: > > Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 > HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics > > dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for > this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No > regressions in warn. Great, thanks for testing and letting me know. greg k-h