From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 19:38:12 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [ 00/16] 3.4.65-stable review Message-ID: <20131004023812.GC3417@kroah.com> References: <20131003040445.523176877@linuxfoundation.org> <524E0AA5.3080604@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <524E0AA5.3080604@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:24:05PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/02/2013 10:05 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.65 release. > >There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >let me know. > > > >Responses should be made by Sat Oct 5 04:04:34 UTC 2013. > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.65-rc1.gz > >and the diffstat can be found below. > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > > > Patch testing: 3.4.65-rc1-rc1 patch applied with white-space > warnings and 3.4.65-rc2 applied cleanly. > > Tested 3.4.65-rc1 and 3.4.65-rc2. > Compile testing: 3.4.65-rc1 and 3.4.65-rc2. Passed > Boot testing: 3.4.65-rc1 and 3.4.65-rc2. Passed > dmesg regression testing: passed. dmesgs look good. No regressions > compared to the previous dmesgs for this release. dmesg emerg, crit, > alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn. Thanks for testing both of these. greg k-h