[ 097/110] ACPI / IPMI: Fix atomic context requirement of ipmi_msg_handler()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>

commit 06a8566bcf5cf7db9843a82cde7a33c7bf3947d9 upstream.

This patch fixes the issues indicated by the test results that
ipmi_msg_handler() is invoked in atomic context.

BUG: scheduling while atomic: kipmi0/18933/0x10000100
Modules linked in: ipmi_si acpi_ipmi ...
CPU: 3 PID: 18933 Comm: kipmi0 Tainted: G       AW    3.10.0-rc7+ #2
Hardware name: QCI QSSC-S4R/QSSC-S4R, BIOS QSSC-S4R.QCI.01.00.0027.070120100606 07/01/2010
 ffff8838245eea00 ffff88103fc63c98 ffffffff814c4a1e ffff88103fc63ca8
 ffffffff814bfbab ffff88103fc63d28 ffffffff814c73e0 ffff88103933cbd4
 0000000000000096 ffff88103fc63ce8 ffff88102f618000 ffff881035c01fd8
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>  [<ffffffff814c4a1e>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
 [<ffffffff814bfbab>] __schedule_bug+0x46/0x54
 [<ffffffff814c73e0>] __schedule+0x83/0x59c
 [<ffffffff81058853>] __cond_resched+0x22/0x2d
 [<ffffffff814c794b>] _cond_resched+0x14/0x1d
 [<ffffffff814c6d82>] mutex_lock+0x11/0x32
 [<ffffffff8101e1e9>] ? __default_send_IPI_dest_field.constprop.0+0x53/0x58
 [<ffffffffa09e3f9c>] ipmi_msg_handler+0x23/0x166 [ipmi_si]
 [<ffffffff812bf6e4>] deliver_response+0x55/0x5a
 [<ffffffff812c0fd4>] handle_new_recv_msgs+0xb67/0xc65
 [<ffffffff81007ad1>] ? read_tsc+0x9/0x19
 [<ffffffff814c8620>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xa/0xc
 [<ffffffffa09e1128>] ipmi_thread+0x5c/0x146 [ipmi_si]
 ...

Also Tony Camuso says:

 We were getting occasional "Scheduling while atomic" call traces
 during boot on some systems. Problem was first seen on a Cisco C210
 but we were able to reproduce it on a Cisco c220m3. Setting
 CONFIG_LOCKDEP and LOCKDEP_SUPPORT to 'y' exposed a lockdep around
 tx_msg_lock in acpi_ipmi.c struct acpi_ipmi_device.

 =================================
 [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
 2.6.32-415.el6.x86_64-debug-splck #1
 ---------------------------------
 inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
 ksoftirqd/3/17 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
  (&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffff81337a27>] ipmi_msg_handler+0x71/0x126
 {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
   [<ffffffff810ba11c>] __lock_acquire+0x63c/0x1570
   [<ffffffff810bb0f4>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x120
   [<ffffffff815581cc>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4c/0x400
   [<ffffffff815586ea>] mutex_lock_nested+0x4a/0x60
   [<ffffffff8133789d>] acpi_ipmi_space_handler+0x11b/0x234
   [<ffffffff81321c62>] acpi_ev_address_space_dispatch+0x170/0x1be

The fix implemented by this change has been tested by Tony:

 Tested the patch in a boot loop with lockdep debug enabled and never
 saw the problem in over 400 reboots.

Reported-and-tested-by: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c |   24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 #include <linux/ipmi.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/pnp.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
 
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Zhao Yakui");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACPI IPMI Opregion driver");
@@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ struct acpi_ipmi_device {
 	struct list_head head;
 	/* the IPMI request message list */
 	struct list_head tx_msg_list;
-	struct mutex	tx_msg_lock;
+	spinlock_t	tx_msg_lock;
 	acpi_handle handle;
 	struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev;
 	ipmi_user_t	user_interface;
@@ -147,6 +148,7 @@ static void acpi_format_ipmi_msg(struct
 	struct kernel_ipmi_msg *msg;
 	struct acpi_ipmi_buffer *buffer;
 	struct acpi_ipmi_device *device;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	msg = &tx_msg->tx_message;
 	/*
@@ -177,10 +179,10 @@ static void acpi_format_ipmi_msg(struct
 
 	/* Get the msgid */
 	device = tx_msg->device;
-	mutex_lock(&device->tx_msg_lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
 	device->curr_msgid++;
 	tx_msg->tx_msgid = device->curr_msgid;
-	mutex_unlock(&device->tx_msg_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void acpi_format_ipmi_response(struct acpi_ipmi_msg *msg,
@@ -242,6 +244,7 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi
 	int msg_found = 0;
 	struct acpi_ipmi_msg *tx_msg;
 	struct pnp_dev *pnp_dev = ipmi_device->pnp_dev;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (msg->user != ipmi_device->user_interface) {
 		dev_warn(&pnp_dev->dev, "Unexpected response is returned. "
@@ -250,7 +253,7 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi
 		ipmi_free_recv_msg(msg);
 		return;
 	}
-	mutex_lock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
 	list_for_each_entry(tx_msg, &ipmi_device->tx_msg_list, head) {
 		if (msg->msgid == tx_msg->tx_msgid) {
 			msg_found = 1;
@@ -258,7 +261,7 @@ static void ipmi_msg_handler(struct ipmi
 		}
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
 	if (!msg_found) {
 		dev_warn(&pnp_dev->dev, "Unexpected response (msg id %ld) is "
 			"returned.\n", msg->msgid);
@@ -378,6 +381,7 @@ acpi_ipmi_space_handler(u32 function, ac
 	struct acpi_ipmi_device *ipmi_device = handler_context;
 	int err, rem_time;
 	acpi_status status;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	/*
 	 * IPMI opregion message.
 	 * IPMI message is firstly written to the BMC and system software
@@ -395,9 +399,9 @@ acpi_ipmi_space_handler(u32 function, ac
 		return AE_NO_MEMORY;
 
 	acpi_format_ipmi_msg(tx_msg, address, value);
-	mutex_lock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
 	list_add_tail(&tx_msg->head, &ipmi_device->tx_msg_list);
-	mutex_unlock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
 	err = ipmi_request_settime(ipmi_device->user_interface,
 					&tx_msg->addr,
 					tx_msg->tx_msgid,
@@ -413,9 +417,9 @@ acpi_ipmi_space_handler(u32 function, ac
 	status = AE_OK;
 
 end_label:
-	mutex_lock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
 	list_del(&tx_msg->head);
-	mutex_unlock(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock, flags);
 	kfree(tx_msg);
 	return status;
 }
@@ -457,7 +461,7 @@ static void acpi_add_ipmi_device(struct
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ipmi_device->head);
 
-	mutex_init(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ipmi_device->tx_msg_list);
 	ipmi_install_space_handler(ipmi_device);