From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:08:02 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [ 00/50] 3.11.6-stable review Message-ID: <20131017170802.GA27458@kroah.com> References: <20131016174358.335646140@linuxfoundation.org> <526015BE.1020404@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <526015BE.1020404@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:52:14AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/16/2013 11:44 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.11.6 release. > >There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >let me know. > > > >Responses should be made by Fri Oct 18 17:43:24 UTC 2013. > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.11.6-rc1.gz > >and the diffstat can be found below. > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > > > 3.11.6 > > Patch applied cleanly - yes > Compile testing - passed > Boot testing - passed > dmesg regression testing - passed > > dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for > this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No > regressions in warn. > Thanks for testing this, and 3.10.17 and letting me know it's all working properly. greg k-h