From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 21:49:50 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [ 00/11] 3.4.67-stable review Message-ID: <20131019044950.GC14996@kroah.com> References: <20131018195049.069623827@linuxfoundation.org> <5261FF5B.9000403@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5261FF5B.9000403@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 09:41:15PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 10/18/2013 01:53 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.67 release. > > There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Oct 20 19:50:39 UTC 2013. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.67-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > Patch applied cleanly yes > Compile testing passed > Boot testing passed > dmesg regression testing passed > Cross-compile testing passed > > dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for > this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions > in warn. Thanks for testing and letting me know. greg k-h