From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:51:05 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Shuah Khan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "shuahkhan@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.4 00/26] 3.4.69-stable review Message-ID: <20131111225105.GB22449@kroah.com> References: <20131109065050.089866597@linuxfoundation.org> <52811AC8.4060804@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52811AC8.4060804@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:58:32AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 11/08/2013 11:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.69 release. > > There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Mon Nov 11 06:50:22 UTC 2013. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.69-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > 3.4.69 > > Patch applied cleanly yes > Compile test passed > Boot test passed > dmesg regression test passed > > dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for > this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in > warn. Thanks for testing and letting me know. greg k-h