* Re: [git pull] fixes for 3.12-final
[not found] ` <20131113144353.GE28033@fieldses.org>
@ 2013-11-13 15:16 ` Bruce Fields
2013-11-18 16:32 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Fields @ 2013-11-13 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Al Viro; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-fsdevel, stable
(Argh, sorry, with the right stable address cc'd this time I hope.)
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:10:04PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> FWIW, not taking ->i_lock there definitely looks like a good thing. As for
> 64bit ->i_ino itself... Looks like the main problem is the shitload of
> printks - the actual uses of ->i_ino are fine, but these suckers create
> a lot of noise. So for now I'm going with Bruce's variant; 64bit i_ino
> doesn't look too bad (even on i386, actually), but it'll have to wait
> until 3.14. Too noisy and late in this cycle...
I believe we also want that in stable?
950ee9566a5b6cc45d15f5fe044bab4f1e8b62cb "exportfs: fix 32-bit nfsd
handling of 64-bit inode numbers"
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [git pull] fixes for 3.12-final
2013-11-13 15:16 ` [git pull] fixes for 3.12-final Bruce Fields
@ 2013-11-18 16:32 ` Greg KH
2013-12-18 19:40 ` Bruce Fields
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2013-11-18 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Fields
Cc: Al Viro, Linus Torvalds, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-fsdevel,
stable
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:16:55AM -0500, Bruce Fields wrote:
> (Argh, sorry, with the right stable address cc'd this time I hope.)
>
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:10:04PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > FWIW, not taking ->i_lock there definitely looks like a good thing. As for
> > 64bit ->i_ino itself... Looks like the main problem is the shitload of
> > printks - the actual uses of ->i_ino are fine, but these suckers create
> > a lot of noise. So for now I'm going with Bruce's variant; 64bit i_ino
> > doesn't look too bad (even on i386, actually), but it'll have to wait
> > until 3.14. Too noisy and late in this cycle...
>
> I believe we also want that in stable?
>
> 950ee9566a5b6cc45d15f5fe044bab4f1e8b62cb "exportfs: fix 32-bit nfsd
> handling of 64-bit inode numbers"
It breaks the build in 3.12 and others so if it is needed, please
provide a backport that works properly to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [git pull] fixes for 3.12-final
2013-11-18 16:32 ` Greg KH
@ 2013-12-18 19:40 ` Bruce Fields
2013-12-18 20:12 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Fields @ 2013-12-18 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: Al Viro, Linus Torvalds, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-fsdevel,
stable
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 08:32:43AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:16:55AM -0500, Bruce Fields wrote:
> > (Argh, sorry, with the right stable address cc'd this time I hope.)
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:10:04PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > > FWIW, not taking ->i_lock there definitely looks like a good thing. As for
> > > 64bit ->i_ino itself... Looks like the main problem is the shitload of
> > > printks - the actual uses of ->i_ino are fine, but these suckers create
> > > a lot of noise. So for now I'm going with Bruce's variant; 64bit i_ino
> > > doesn't look too bad (even on i386, actually), but it'll have to wait
> > > until 3.14. Too noisy and late in this cycle...
> >
> > I believe we also want that in stable?
> >
> > 950ee9566a5b6cc45d15f5fe044bab4f1e8b62cb "exportfs: fix 32-bit nfsd
> > handling of 64-bit inode numbers"
>
> It breaks the build in 3.12 and others so if it is needed, please
> provide a backport that works properly to stable@vger.kernel.org.
Oops--there was a prerequisite patch that I forgot. So we actually want
git cherry-pick b7a6ec52dd4eced4a9bcda9ca85b3c8af84d3c90
git cherry-pick 950ee9566a5b6cc45d15f5fe044bab4f1e8b62cb
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [git pull] fixes for 3.12-final
2013-12-18 19:40 ` Bruce Fields
@ 2013-12-18 20:12 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2013-12-18 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Fields
Cc: Al Viro, Linus Torvalds, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-fsdevel,
stable
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:40:34PM -0500, Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 08:32:43AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:16:55AM -0500, Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > (Argh, sorry, with the right stable address cc'd this time I hope.)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:10:04PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > > > FWIW, not taking ->i_lock there definitely looks like a good thing. As for
> > > > 64bit ->i_ino itself... Looks like the main problem is the shitload of
> > > > printks - the actual uses of ->i_ino are fine, but these suckers create
> > > > a lot of noise. So for now I'm going with Bruce's variant; 64bit i_ino
> > > > doesn't look too bad (even on i386, actually), but it'll have to wait
> > > > until 3.14. Too noisy and late in this cycle...
> > >
> > > I believe we also want that in stable?
> > >
> > > 950ee9566a5b6cc45d15f5fe044bab4f1e8b62cb "exportfs: fix 32-bit nfsd
> > > handling of 64-bit inode numbers"
> >
> > It breaks the build in 3.12 and others so if it is needed, please
> > provide a backport that works properly to stable@vger.kernel.org.
>
> Oops--there was a prerequisite patch that I forgot. So we actually want
>
> git cherry-pick b7a6ec52dd4eced4a9bcda9ca85b3c8af84d3c90
> git cherry-pick 950ee9566a5b6cc45d15f5fe044bab4f1e8b62cb
Thanks, I'll go take them now.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-18 20:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20131103015803.GK13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFy3tAeLYL3_+PbeD15p6PGS-P7bs8fMUaRVSC0OCzvq6w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20131103195452.GL13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFwW9s3GCa+zNTMg7m44-cj2RdJp7wRpCnPUvQHm9xYnFg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20131104005300.GM13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20131106151003.GA21425@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20131113144353.GE28033@fieldses.org>
2013-11-13 15:16 ` [git pull] fixes for 3.12-final Bruce Fields
2013-11-18 16:32 ` Greg KH
2013-12-18 19:40 ` Bruce Fields
2013-12-18 20:12 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).