From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:10:22 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Ryo Munakata Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/118] 3.12.6-stable review Message-ID: <20131219161022.GA29408@kroah.com> References: <20131218211219.461663463@linuxfoundation.org> <20131220005851.14c72baecfcf67d33877d996@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131220005851.14c72baecfcf67d33877d996@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:58:51AM +0900, Ryo Munakata wrote: > On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:10:37 -0800 > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.6 release. > > There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Fri Dec 20 21:12:03 UTC 2013. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.6-rc1.gz > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > Results: > Target: 3.12.6-rc2 > Patching: No errors > Compilation: No errors > Boot: No errors > dmesg: No regressions compared to the previous stable kernel > > Looks good to me. Thanks for testing and letting me know. greg k-h