From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:29:06 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/120] 3.13.3-stable review Message-ID: <20140212042906.GD26490@roeck-us.net> References: <20140211184823.492407127@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140211184823.492407127@linuxfoundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:04:01AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Some -stable releases spring out from my build system bright and shiny > and ready to go. Not so with these releases. Maybe it's the horrid > weather that was happening during the creation of these kernels, or > something else, but whatever it was, they came into this world > screaming, kicking, killing build servers left-and-right, and breaking > the build every other patch. Some developers decided to get into the > act, constantly pushing the boundaries of what is an acceptable -stable > patch, and trying to skirt the rules of upstream patches first numerous > times, making me even grumpier than normal, "forcing" me to relax and > take in an afternoon playing of the Lego movie... > Come on, compared to me you are never grumpy. > Test these out well, they have barely survived my systems, and I don't > trust them in the slightest to not eat your disks, reap your tasks, and > run away laughing as your CPU turns into a space heater. > > You have been warned. > Hmm ... not sure if I want to take that risk :-). Going to be fun. And looking for volunteers to provide me with a really great test suite which I can run in qemu (and which doesn't take me days to set up). > ----------------- > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.13.3 release. > There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu Feb 13 18:47:55 UTC 2014. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Build results: total: 126 pass: 122 skipped: 4 fail: 0 qemu tests all passed. Results are as expected (even though that may be unexpected in this case ;-). Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. Guenter